Literature DB >> 18707476

The evolution of interacting phenotypes: genetics and evolution of social dominance.

Allen J Moore1, Kenneth F Haynes, Richard F Preziosi, Patricia J Moore.   

Abstract

Although the argument over genetic influences on social dominance is contentious, genetic models of interacting phenotypes provide a theoretical framework for heritable effects on, and therefore evolution of, social behavior. Here we adapt the interacting phenotype model to show how social dominance can evolve. Our model makes a number of predictions: rapid evolution of behavior, strong correlated responses in associated traits (such as a badge of status), and, because context is important for social dominance, integrated evolution of both dominant and subordinate behavior reflecting direct and indirect genetic effects and social selection. We also describe the results of empirical work, artificial selection based on social status within a hierarchy in the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea, that we used to test the predictions of our model. There was little change within selection lines in the expression of agonistic behavior, but by just generation 7 of selection, in comparisons between lines, high-line males consistently dominated low and control males, while low-line males were consistently subordinate to high-line and control males. There was a strong correlated response to selection in the pheromonal badge of status. Some correlated responses to selection differed among replicate lines, with the compound that makes males subordinate changed in one replicate, while the compound that confers dominance was altered in the other. Overall, our results are consistent with predictions from models of interacting phenotypes: social dominance is influenced by additive genetic variation, can evolve as a result of social selection, and evolution of social interactions appears to be rapid. Finally, different responses in the replicates allowed us to test very specific predictions regarding the role of the social pheromone in N. cinerea, highlighting the value of artificial selection experiments as a tool in evolutionary behavioral genetic studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 18707476     DOI: 10.1086/342899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  26 in total

1.  Evolution in a genetically heritable social environment.

Authors:  James M Cheverud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The social selection alternative to sexual selection.

Authors:  Joan Roughgarden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.

Authors:  Donna Petfield; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Sweet scents from good bacteria: Case studies on bacterial volatile compounds for plant growth and immunity.

Authors:  Joon-hui Chung; Geun Cheol Song; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Genetic influences on social dominance: cow wars.

Authors:  A J Moore
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Competitive ability in male house mice (Mus musculus): genetic influences.

Authors:  Christopher B Cunningham; James S Ruff; Kevin Chase; Wayne K Potts; David R Carrier
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Applying Quantitative Genetic Methods to Primate Social Behavior.

Authors:  Gregory E Blomquist; Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Indirect genetic effects and the genetic bases of social dominance: evidence from cattle.

Authors:  C Sartori; R Mantovani
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  Post-genomic behavioral genetics: From revolution to routine.

Authors:  D G Ashbrook; M K Mulligan; R W Williams
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Uriel Gelin; Marie-Claude Perron; Denis Réale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.