Literature DB >> 18707440

Will small population sizes warn us of impending extinctions?

Peter A Abrams1.   

Abstract

Several models are used to show that population sizes are often relatively insensitive to deteriorating environmental conditions over most of the range of environments that allow population persistence. As conditions continue to worsen in these cases, equilibrium population sizes ultimately decline rapidly toward extinction from sizes similar to or larger than those before environmental decline began. Consumer-resource models predict that equilibrium or average population size can increase with deteriorating environmental conditions over a large part of the range of the environmental parameter that allows persistence. The initial insensitivity or increase in the population of the focal species occurs because changes in the populations of other components of the food web compensate for the decline in one or more fitness components of the focal population. However, the compensatory processes are generally nonlinear and often approach their limits abruptly rather than gradually. When there is steady directional change in the environment, populations lag behind the equilibrium population size specified by current environmental conditions. The environmental variable can then decline below the level required for population persistence while the population size is still close to or greater than its original value. Efficient consumers and self-reproducing resources are especially likely to produce this outcome. More complex models with adaptive behavior, additional consumers, or additional resources often exhibit similar trajectories of population size under environmental deterioration.

Year:  2002        PMID: 18707440     DOI: 10.1086/341521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

Review 1.  The stability of ecosystems: a brief overview of the paradox of enrichment.

Authors:  Shovonlal Roy; J Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Trophic interactions and range limits: the diverse roles of predation.

Authors:  Robert D Holt; Michael Barfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Predation yields greater population performance: What are the contributions of density- and trait-mediated effects?

Authors:  Joseph T Neale; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.465

4.  Eco-evolutionary feedbacks during experimental range expansions.

Authors:  Emanuel A Fronhofer; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Monitoring strategy for eight amphibian species in French Guiana, South America.

Authors:  Elodie A Courtois; Jennifer Devillechabrolle; Maël Dewynter; Kévin Pineau; Philippe Gaucher; Jérôme Chave
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluating the potential effectiveness of compensatory mitigation strategies for marine bycatch.

Authors:  Myra Finkelstein; Victoria Bakker; Daniel F Doak; Ben Sullivan; Rebecca Lewison; William H Satterthwaite; Peter B McIntyre; Shaye Wolf; David Priddel; Jennifer M Arnold; Robert W Henry; Paul Sievert; John Croxall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Consequences of variation in foraging success among predators on numerical response.

Authors:  Toshinori Okuyama
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The Species-Specific Responses of Freshwater Diatoms to Elevated Temperatures Are Affected by Interspecific Interactions.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Chengrong Peng; Zhicong Wang; Jinli Zhang; Lijie Li; Shun Huang; Dunhai Li
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.