Literature DB >> 18707315

Effects of resource distribution on sexual selection and the cost of reproduction in sandgobies.

K Lindström1.   

Abstract

I describe the results of an experimental manipulation of resource availability (nest substrate) and distribution (nest size), leading to effects on the opportunity for sexual selection and the survival of male sandgobies Pomatoschistus minutus competing for these resources. This study represents one of few such experimental manipulations. It shows a clear-cut effect of male-male competition on the survival of males, and it shows temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection, suggesting that short-term assessment of sexual selection could be misleading. Males breeding under male-male competition for nest sites lived on average 18 d less than males in the high-nest-availability treatment. This considerable cost of reproduction probably stems from increased stress levels as a result of higher levels of aggression. The opportunity for sexual selection was high throughout the 2-mo experiment in the low-nest-availability treatment, while in the high nest availability, it changed in a complex manner over the season. In the latter case, sexual selection was initially low but increased during midseason to values nearly as high as in the nest-site-limited environment and then decreased again toward the end of the season. Previous studies have shown that temporal variation in sexual selection follows variation in population density and sex ratio. This study demonstrates that there can be considerable temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection without changes in population parameters.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 18707315     DOI: 10.1086/320867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

1.  Within- and between-year variations of reproductive strategy and cost in a population of Siberian chipmunks.

Authors:  Christie Le Coeur; Benoît Pisanu; Jean-Louis Chapuis; Alexandre Robert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

3.  Protogynous functional hermaphroditism in the North American annual killifish, Millerichthys robustus.

Authors:  Omar Domínguez-Castanedo; Sharon Valdez-Carbajal; Tessy M Muñoz-Campos; Jean H Huber; Martin Reichard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Survival costs of reproduction vary with age in North American red squirrels.

Authors:  Sébastien Descamps; Stan Boutin; Andrew G McAdam; Dominique Berteaux; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Size Dependent Male Reproductive Tactic in the Two-Spotted Goby (Gobiusculus flavescens).

Authors:  A C Utne-Palm; K Eduard; K H Jensen; I Mayer; P J Jakobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Seasonal variation in female mate choice and operational sex ratio in wild populations of an annual fish, Austrolebias reicherti.

Authors:  Carlos Passos; Bettina Tassino; Federico Reyes; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ecological variation along the salinity gradient in the Baltic Sea Area and its consequences for reproduction in the common goby.

Authors:  Isabel Mück; Katja U Heubel
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Female mating competition alters female mating preferences in common gobies.

Authors:  Katja Heubel
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Resource acquisition and pre-copulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Chelsea Langley; Elijah Reyes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  A high aggression strategy for smaller males.

Authors:  P Andreas Svensson; Topi K Lehtonen; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.