Literature DB >> 18706383

Theoretical, psychometric, and pragmatic issues in pain measurement.

Céline Gélinas1, Carmen G Loiselle, Sylvie LeMay, Manon Ranger, Emilie Bouchard, Dianne McCormack.   

Abstract

Measurement is essential to nursing practice and research, and adequate tool selection is crucial for both. The present paper seeks to provide an overview of key issues to consider in tool development, selection, and psychometric testing using the concept of pain. Both the classic and the contemporary approaches to validity are described and compared. Although sharing similar features, the contemporary approach seems more encompassing, because it considers measurement purposes, participants' characteristics, and conditions under which instruments are used. Strategies pertaining to reliability and validity testing are discussed and illustrated with specific pain assessment measures, including pain intensity scales, multidimensional questionnaires, and other behavioral tools. Depending on measurement purposes, the more appropriate strategies are highlighted. Cultural issues in pain measurement as well as pragmatic criteria for measure selection also are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18706383     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs        ISSN: 1524-9042            Impact factor:   1.929


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pain Assessment in Noncommunicative Adult Palliative Care Patients.

Authors:  Deborah B McGuire; Karen Snow Kaiser; Mary Ellen Haisfield-Wolfe; Florence Iyamu
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 2.  Racial and ethnic differences in the experience and treatment of noncancer pain.

Authors:  Samantha M Meints; Alejandro Cortes; Calia A Morais; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2019-05-29

Review 3.  Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review.

Authors:  T Shiva Shahiri; Philippe Richebé; Melissa Richard-Lalonde; Céline Gélinas
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  Behavioral changes in brain-injured critical care adults with different levels of consciousness during nociceptive stimulation: an observational study.

Authors:  Marie-José Roulin; Anne-Sylvie Ramelet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Assessing patient-centred care for chronic pain: Validation of a new research paradigm.

Authors:  Emilie Paul-Savoie; Patricia Bourgault; Emilie Gosselin; Stéphane Potvin; Sylvie Lafrenaye
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gillian Ray-Barruel; Denise F Polit; Jenny E Murfield; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Measuring pain in non-verbal critically ill patients: which pain instrument?

Authors:  Jean-Francois Payen; Céline Gélinas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Preliminary development and validation of a new end-of-life patient-reported outcome measure assessing the ability of patients to finalise their affairs at the end of life.

Authors:  Nikki McCaffrey; Pawel Skuza; Katrina Breaden; Simon Eckermann; Janet Hardy; Sheila Oaten; Michael Briffa; David Currow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pain assessment of traumatic brain injury victims using the Brazilian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale.

Authors:  Caíque Jordan Nunes Ribeiro; Andra Carla Santos de Araújo; Saulo Barreto Brito; Daniele Vieira Dantas; Mariangela da Silva Nunes; José Antonio Barreto Alves; Maria do Carmo de Oliveira Ribeiro
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2018-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.