Literature DB >> 18704949

Dissection, residue conservation, and structural classification of protein-DNA interfaces.

Sumit Biswas1, Mainak Guharoy, Pinak Chakrabarti.   

Abstract

The basic DNA-binding modules of 128 protein-DNA interfaces have been analyzed. Although these are less planar, like the protein-protein interfaces, the protein-DNA interfaces can also be dissected into core regions in which all the fully-buried atoms are located, and rim regions having atoms with residual accessibilities. The sequence entropy of the core residues is smaller than those in the rim, indicating that the former are better conserved and possibly contribute more towards the binding free energy, as has been implicated in protein-protein interactions. On the protein side, 1014 A(2) of the surface is buried of which 63% belong to the core. There are some differences in the propensities of residues to occur in the core and the rim. In the DNA strands, the nucleotide(s) containing fully-buried atoms in all three components usually occupy central positions of the binding region. A new classification scheme for the interfaces has been introduced based on the composition of secondary structural elements of residues and the results compared with the conventional classification of DNA-binding proteins, as well as the protein class of the molecule. It appears that a common framework may be developed to understand both protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18704949     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  14 in total

1.  Dynamic roles for the N-terminus of the yeast G protein-coupled receptor Ste2p.

Authors:  M Seraj Uddin; Fred Naider; Jeffrey M Becker
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Specific labeling of threonine methyl groups for NMR studies of protein-nucleic acid complexes.

Authors:  Kaustubh Sinha; Linda Jen-Jacobson; Gordon S Rule
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Structural changes in DNA-binding proteins on complexation.

Authors:  Sayan Poddar; Devlina Chakravarty; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Conserved residue clusters at protein-protein interfaces and their use in binding site identification.

Authors:  Mainak Guharoy; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Divide and conquer is always best: sensitivity of methyl correlation experiments.

Authors:  Kaustubh Sinha; Linda Jen-Jacobson; Gordon S Rule
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Characterization and prediction of the binding site in DNA-binding proteins: improvement of accuracy by combining residue composition, evolutionary conservation and structural parameters.

Authors:  Sucharita Dey; Arumay Pal; Mainak Guharoy; Shrihari Sonavane; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Bioinformatic analysis of the protein/DNA interface.

Authors:  Bohdan Schneider; Jirí Cerný; Daniel Svozil; Petr Cech; Jean-Christophe Gelly; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Cavities in protein-DNA and protein-RNA interfaces.

Authors:  Shrihari Sonavane; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Structural segments and residue propensities in protein-RNA interfaces: comparison with protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Sumit Biswas; Mainak Guharoy; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2008-07-14

10.  An updated version of NPIDB includes new classifications of DNA-protein complexes and their families.

Authors:  Olga Zanegina; Dmitriy Kirsanov; Eugene Baulin; Anna Karyagina; Andrei Alexeevski; Sergey Spirin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.