Literature DB >> 18704282

Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart in poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in China.

James L Palmer1, Meaghan Gibbs, Huib W K F H Scheijbeler, Robert W Kotchie, Steffen Nielsen, Jeremy White, William J Valentine.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes is an increasing problem in China, yet there is a paucity of data regarding the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in the Chinese setting.
METHODS: Previous data were obtained from PRESENT (Physicians' Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix 30 Therapy), a multi-country, single-arm, observational study where type 2 diabetes patients poorly controlled with biphasic human insulin (BHI) were converted to biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30); the Chinese subgroup experienced an improvement in HbA(1c) and a reduction in hypoglycaemic events. A published and validated computer simulation model of diabetes (the CORE Diabetes Model) was used to estimate the long-term clinical and cost consequences of switching to BIAsp30 from BHI in the Chinese setting. Treatment effects and patient characteristics were derived from PRESENT and country-specific published sources. Primary research was performed to ascertain patient management practices and diabetes-related complication costs. Risks of modelled complications were derived from landmark clinical trials and epidemiological studies. Costs and clinical projections were made over patient lifetimes from a third-party payer perspective and discounted at 3% annually. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Conversion to BIAsp30 from BHI was projected to improve discounted life expectancy by 0.38 years per patient (9.91 vs 9.53 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.91 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient (6.32 vs 5.41 QALYs). Conversion to BIAsp30 was associated with increased direct medical costs of Chinese Yuan (CNY) 1751 per patient, due to higher pharmacy and management costs (CNY +19,007), offset by reduced diabetes-related complication costs (CNY -17,254) over patient lifetimes. BIAsp30 was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CNY 1926 per QALY gained.
CONCLUSION: BIAsp30 was projected to substantially improve clinical outcomes but was associated with increased lifetime medical costs. BIAsp30 would be considered cost-effective in China given a willingness-to-pay threshold of CNY 100,000 per QALY gained in type 2 diabetes patients poorly controlled on BHI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18704282     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-008-0080-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  10 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Analogues in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Asrul Akmal Shafie; Chin Hui Ng; Yui Ping Tan; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (NovoMix 30) when switching from human premix insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: subgroup analysis from the 6-month IMPROVE observational study.

Authors:  S Shah; M Benroubi; V Borzi; J Gumprecht; R Kawamori; J Shaban; M Shestakova; Y Wenying; P Valensi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Metformin Combined with Liraglutide or Exenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on the CORE Diabetes Model Study.

Authors:  Xuesong Zhang; Sisi Liu; Yukun Li; Yan Wang; Meimei Tian; Guoqiang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Saxagliptin versus Acarbose as Second-Line Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes in China.

Authors:  Shuyan Gu; Yuhang Zeng; Demin Yu; Xiaoqian Hu; Hengjin Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin versus Acarbose as a Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes in China.

Authors:  Shuyan Gu; Yiming Mu; Suodi Zhai; Yuhang Zeng; Xuemei Zhen; Hengjin Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  How Consistent is the Relationship between Improved Glucose Control and Modelled Health Outcomes for People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xinyang Hua; Thomas Wai-Chun Lung; Andrew Palmer; Lei Si; William H Herman; Philip Clarke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Choice across 10 pharmacologic combination strategies for type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Shuyan Gu; Lizheng Shi; Hui Shao; Xiaoyong Wang; Xiaoqian Hu; Yuxuan Gu; Hengjin Dong
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Economic Burden in Chinese Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Using Electronic Insurance Claims Data.

Authors:  Yunyu Huang; Pepijn Vemer; Jingjing Zhu; Maarten J Postma; Wen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Description of a New Predictive Modeling Approach That Correlates the Risk and Associated Cost of Well-Defined Diabetes-Related Complications With Changes in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Authors:  Kurt Fortwaengler; Christopher G Parkin; Kurt Neeser; Monika Neumann; Oliver Mast
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-20

10.  Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease in China.

Authors:  Mafalda Ramos; Peng Men; Xu Wang; Anastasia Ustyugova; Mark Lamotte
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.