Literature DB >> 18704081

Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance'.

Daniel Salart1, Augustin Baas, Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Gisin, Hugo Zbinden.   

Abstract

Correlations are generally described by one of two mechanisms: either a first event influences a second one by sending information encoded in bosons or other physical carriers, or the correlated events have some common causes in their shared history. Quantum physics predicts an entirely different kind of cause for some correlations, named entanglement. This reveals itself in correlations that violate Bell inequalities (implying that they cannot be described by common causes) between space-like separated events (implying that they cannot be described by classical communication). Many Bell tests have been performed, and loopholes related to locality and detection have been closed in several independent experiments. It is still possible that a first event could influence a second, but the speed of this hypothetical influence (Einstein's 'spooky action at a distance') would need to be defined in some universal privileged reference frame and be greater than the speed of light. Here we put stringent experimental bounds on the speed of all such hypothetical influences. We performed a Bell test over more than 24 hours between two villages separated by 18 km and approximately east-west oriented, with the source located precisely in the middle. We continuously observed two-photon interferences well above the Bell inequality threshold. Taking advantage of the Earth's rotation, the configuration of our experiment allowed us to determine, for any hypothetically privileged frame, a lower bound for the speed of the influence. For example, if such a privileged reference frame exists and is such that the Earth's speed in this frame is less than 10(-3) times that of the speed of light, then the speed of the influence would have to exceed that of light by at least four orders of magnitude.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18704081     DOI: 10.1038/nature07121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  8 in total

Review 1.  From quantum foundations to applications and back.

Authors:  Nicolas Gisin; Florian Fröwis
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Quantum erasure with causally disconnected choice.

Authors:  Xiao-Song Ma; Johannes Kofler; Angie Qarry; Nuray Tetik; Thomas Scheidl; Rupert Ursin; Sven Ramelow; Thomas Herbst; Lothar Ratschbacher; Alessandro Fedrizzi; Thomas Jennewein; Anton Zeilinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comment on Masanari Asano et al.: A model of epigenetic evolution based on theory of open quantum systems.

Authors:  Vasily Ogryzko
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2013-10-24

4.  Biology: Motion is Function.

Authors:  Lauren Gerard Koch; Steven L Britton
Journal:  Function (Oxf)       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  Long-distance distribution of genuine energy-time entanglement.

Authors:  A Cuevas; G Carvacho; G Saavedra; J Cariñe; W A T Nogueira; M Figueroa; A Cabello; P Mataloni; G Lima; G B Xavier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Quantum probability assignment limited by relativistic causality.

Authors:  Yeong Deok Han; Taeseung Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Why Bohmian Mechanics? One- and Two-Time Position Measurements, Bell Inequalities, Philosophy, and Physics.

Authors:  Nicolas Gisin
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Simulation of the Bell inequality violation based on quantum steering concept.

Authors:  Mohsen Ruzbehani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.