Literature DB >> 18703812

Disparate stroke rates on warfarin among contemporaneous cohorts with atrial fibrillation: potential insights into risk from a comparative analysis of SPORTIF III versus SPORTIF V.

Elaine M Hylek1, Lars Frison, Lori E Henault, Adrienne Cupples.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The rate of stroke among warfarin-treated patients in SPORTIF V was approximately half that of patients enrolled in SPORTIF III (1.16%/year versus 2.30%/year). SPORTIF III was an open-label trial comparing ximelagatran with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. SPORTIF V was a double-blind trial performed in North America. The trial design was otherwise identical. We sought to determine if differences in baseline characteristics, use of potentially risk-modifying medications, or anticoagulation control help to explain the lower risk of stroke among warfarin-treated patients in SPORTIF V.
METHODS: Cox regression with stepwise model selection was used to define the covariates independently associated with stroke. Secondary analyses identified covariates with the strongest influence on the study factor (V/III). These covariates were then added to the primary model. Cox regression was used to determine the degree of confounding exerted by these covariates that might help to explain the differences between the trials.
RESULTS: Independent risk factors for stroke on warfarin included prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, coronary artery disease, international normalized ratio, weight, and study. Patients in SPORTIF V were at half the risk as those in SPORTIF III. We found that lower international normalized ratio variability, a higher proportion of prevalent warfarin use, lower systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, and a greater proportion of statin use among patients in SPORTIF V collectively conferred a lower risk of stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in blood pressure control, international normalized ratio variability, proportion of prevalent warfarin users, statin exposure, and high-density lipoprotein collectively conferred a lower risk of stroke to patients in SPORTIF V. These findings suggest that the different event rates were not due to chance and provide potential insights into stroke risk among warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18703812     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.514935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  10 in total

Review 1.  Novel oral anticoagulants to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Freek W A Verheugt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: is warfarin still an option? Yes: Debate at the Controversies in Neurology Congress, Beijing, October 2011.

Authors:  J David Spence
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Dabigatran in atrial fibrillation: pharmacology and clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael D Ezekowitz; Rangadham Nagarakanti
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Reducing The Risk Of Stroke In Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation With Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Is One Of These Not Like The Others?

Authors:  Paul P Dobesh; John Fanikos
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

5.  Stroke: Atrial fibrillation, stroke prevention therapy and aging.

Authors:  J David Spence
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Understanding Differences and Similarities.

Authors:  Paul P Dobesh; John Fanikos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Measures of vitamin K antagonist control reported in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Mearns; Jessica Hawthorne; Ju-Sung Song; Craig I Coleman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Low Reporting of Cointerventions in Recent Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elisavet Moutzouri; Luise Adam; Martin Feller; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Bruno R Da Costa; Cinzia Del Giovane; Douglas C Bauer; Drahomir Aujesky; Arnaud Chiolero; Nicolas Rodondi
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients switched from vitamin K antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maja Hellfritzsch; Kasper Adelborg; Per Damkier; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Jesper Hallas; Anton Pottegård; Erik Lerkevang Grove
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.080

10.  Atrial Fibrillation Burden Detected by Dual-Chamber Pacemakers as a Predictor for Cardiac Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Song-Yun Chu; Jie Jiang; Yu-Ling Wang; Qin-Hui Sheng; Jing Zhou; Yan-Sheng Ding
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.