Literature DB >> 18703385

The cross-species prediction of bacterial promoters using a support vector machine.

Michael Towsey1, Peter Timms, James Hogan, Sarah A Mathews.   

Abstract

Due to degeneracy of the observed binding sites, the in silico prediction of bacterial sigma(70)-like promoters remains a challenging problem. A large number of sigma(70)-like promoters has been biologically identified in only two species, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. In this paper we investigate the issues that arise when searching for promoters in other species using an ensemble of SVM classifiers trained on E. coli promoters. DNA sequences are represented using a tagged mismatch string kernel. The major benefit of our approach is that it does not require a prior definition of the typical -35 and -10 hexamers. This gives the SVM classifiers the freedom to discover other features relevant to the prediction of promoters. We use our approach to predict sigma(A) promoters in B. subtilis and sigma(66) promoters in Chlamydia trachomatis. We extended the analysis to identify specific regulatory features of gene sets in C. trachomatis having different expression profiles. We found a strong -35 hexamer and TGN/-10 associated with a set of early expressed genes. Our analysis highlights the advantage of using TSS-PREDICT as a starting point for predicting promoters in species where few are known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18703385     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2008.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Chem        ISSN: 1476-9271            Impact factor:   2.877


  9 in total

1.  MULTiPly: a novel multi-layer predictor for discovering general and specific types of promoters.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Fuyi Li; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; André Leier; Cunshuo Fan; Chee Keong Kwoh; Kuo-Chen Chou; Jiangning Song; Cangzhi Jia
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Cangzhi Jia; Fuyi Li; Chen Li; Yan Zhu; Tatsuya Akutsu; Geoffrey I Webb; Quan Zou; Lachlan J M Coin; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters identification based on residual network transfer learning.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Yuqiao Xu; Yachuan Luo; Li Teng
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  TSSFinder-fast and accurate ab initio prediction of the core promoter in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Mauro de Medeiros Oliveira; Igor Bonadio; Alicia Lie de Melo; Glaucia Mendes Souza; Alan Mitchell Durham
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  An empirical strategy to detect bacterial transcript structure from directional RNA-seq transcriptome data.

Authors:  Yejun Wang; Keith D MacKenzie; Aaron P White
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  A portable expression resource for engineering cross-species genetic circuits and pathways.

Authors:  Manish Kushwaha; Howard M Salis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Image-based promoter prediction: a promoter prediction method based on evolutionarily generated patterns.

Authors:  Sheng Wang; Xuesong Cheng; Yajun Li; Min Wu; Yuhua Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  pcPromoter-CNN: A CNN-Based Prediction and Classification of Promoters.

Authors:  Muhammad Shujaat; Abdul Wahab; Hilal Tayara; Kil To Chong
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  An iterative strategy combining biophysical criteria and duration hidden Markov models for structural predictions of Chlamydia trachomatis sigma66 promoters.

Authors:  Ronna R Mallios; David M Ojcius; David H Ardell
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.