AIMS: Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is recommended to diagnose and stratify chronic kidney disease (CKD). Can cystatin-C (cysC) assay improve the results in diabetic patients? METHODS: In 124 diabetic patients with a wide range of GFR, as determined by 51Cr-EDTA clearance (i-GFR), we estimated 'e-GFR' by: the recommended Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation; the new Mayo Clinic quadratic (MCQ) equation; the recently proposed composite estimation including both serum creatinine and cysC; and a simplified approach dividing the MDRD by cysC if less than 1.10mg/L. RESULTS: The highest diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves) and the highest proportions of well-stratified patients were obtained by cysC and the MDRD which, however, underestimated i-GFR for patients without CKD (-17%, P<0.001). The CG overestimated GFR in KDOQI stages 1 and 2, ignored stage 5 and was the least accurate. The MCQ equation overrepresented stage 2, overestimating GFR at this stage (+23%, P<0.005). The composite estimation (54.7+/-27.0mL per minute 1.73m(2)) correlated best with i-GFR (56.1+/-35.3; r=0.90, P<0.001), and did not significantly differ from it across the entire population and within each Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) stage but was also biased (Bland-Altman procedure). Simply dividing the MDRD by cysC ifless than1.10mg/L produced a comparable performance and eliminated the bias. CONCLUSION: The recommended creatinine-based estimations of GFR need to be improved. CysC assay helps in the diagnosis and stratification of CKD and leads to better estimates of GFR in diabetic patients without any substantial increase in complexity.
AIMS: Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is recommended to diagnose and stratify chronic kidney disease (CKD). Can cystatin-C (cysC) assay improve the results in diabeticpatients? METHODS: In 124 diabeticpatients with a wide range of GFR, as determined by 51Cr-EDTA clearance (i-GFR), we estimated 'e-GFR' by: the recommended Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation; the new Mayo Clinic quadratic (MCQ) equation; the recently proposed composite estimation including both serum creatinine and cysC; and a simplified approach dividing the MDRD by cysC if less than 1.10mg/L. RESULTS: The highest diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves) and the highest proportions of well-stratified patients were obtained by cysC and the MDRD which, however, underestimated i-GFR for patients without CKD (-17%, P<0.001). The CG overestimated GFR in KDOQI stages 1 and 2, ignored stage 5 and was the least accurate. The MCQ equation overrepresented stage 2, overestimating GFR at this stage (+23%, P<0.005). The composite estimation (54.7+/-27.0mL per minute 1.73m(2)) correlated best with i-GFR (56.1+/-35.3; r=0.90, P<0.001), and did not significantly differ from it across the entire population and within each Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) stage but was also biased (Bland-Altman procedure). Simply dividing the MDRD by cysC ifless than1.10mg/L produced a comparable performance and eliminated the bias. CONCLUSION: The recommended creatinine-based estimations of GFR need to be improved. CysC assay helps in the diagnosis and stratification of CKD and leads to better estimates of GFR in diabeticpatients without any substantial increase in complexity.
Authors: Yun Kyung Jeon; Mi Ra Kim; Jung Eun Huh; Ji Young Mok; Sang Heon Song; Sang Soo Kim; Bo Hyun Kim; Soo Hyoung Lee; Yong Ki Kim; In Joo Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Lyubov Chaykovska; Karoline von Websky; Jan Rahnenführer; Markus Alter; Susi Heiden; Holger Fuchs; Frank Runge; Thomas Klein; Berthold Hocher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 3.240