Literature DB >> 18702687

Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.

Yu-Hsi Hsieh1, An-Liang Zhou, Hwai-Jeng Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists on how the length and diameter of colonoscopes affect the quality of colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare a long pediatric colonoscope with an intermediate length adult colonoscope with regards to completion rate and cecal intubation time. Whether either scope may be more efficient in any subgroups was also investigated.
METHODS: Asymptomatic patients admitted to the physical check-up department of Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital were included. A single endoscopist performed all of the colonoscopic examinations under sedation. Consecutive patients were randomized to undergo colonoscopy with either intermediate length adult colonoscope (CF-240I) or long pediatric colonoscope (PCF-240L). The success rate and time required to reach cecum were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Between April 2005 and February 2006, a total of 918 patients were enrolled. Incomplete colonoscopy occurred in 21 (2.3%) cases (14 in the CF-240I group and seven in the PCF-240L group, P > 0.1). The overall cecal mean insertion time was 6.00 +/- 3.66 min. There was no significant difference between the CF-240I and PCF 240L groups with regard to the cecal intubation rate (96.9% vs 98.5%, P = 0.18), the need for abdominal pressure (71.7% vs 73.4%, P = 0.55) and change of position (13.5% vs 11.5%, P = 0.37). However, the cecal intubation time was shorter in the CF-240I group (5.75 +/- 3.18 vs 6.26 +/- 3.30 min, P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis by sex, age, and body mass index showed comparable outcomes between the two groups except that the cecal intubation times were significantly shorter in the CF-240I group when only men (4.78 +/- 2.57 vs 5.50 +/- 2.93 min, P < 0.01) or those younger than 50 years (5.50 +/- 2.90 vs 6.25 +/- 3.68 min, P = 0.02) were considered.
CONCLUSION: Cecal intubation time is shorter in patients examined with an intermediate length adult colonoscope, mainly in the subgroups of men and those younger than 50 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18702687     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04864.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  3 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of an adult, an intermediate pediatric and a long pediatric colonoscope in the training process of gastrointestinal fellows to achieve high-quality practice in colonoscopy.

Authors:  George Tribonias; Athanasios-Dimitrios Bacasis; Yoriaki Komeda; George Lyrakos; Ioannis Giotis; Niki Daferera; Dimitrios Charisis; Margarita-Eleni Manola; Dimitrios Karapiperis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-12

2.  Development of a colonoscopy add-on device for improvement of the intubation process.

Authors:  Jonathan D Litten; Junghun Choi; David Drozek
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-12-16

3.  A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long.

Authors:  Kwang-Min Kim; Seung-Hwa Lee; Duck-Joo Lee; Kyu-Nam Kim; Sang-Wook Seo; Hyung-Suk Lee; Dong-Ryul Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.