Literature DB >> 18702575

Event-related potential evidence that automatic recollection can be voluntarily avoided.

Zara M Bergström1, Jan de Fockert, Alan Richardson-Klavehn.   

Abstract

Voluntary control processes can be recruited to facilitate recollection in situations where a retrieval cue fails to automatically bring to mind a desired episodic memory. We investigated whether voluntary control processes can also stop recollection of unwanted memories that would otherwise have been automatically recollected. Participants were trained on cue-associate word-pairs, then repeatedly presented with the cue and asked to either recollect or avoid recollecting the associate, while having the event-related potential (ERP) correlate of conscious recollection measured. Halfway through the phase, some cues switched instructions so that participants had to start avoiding recall of associates they had previously repeatedly recalled, and vice versa. ERPs during recollection avoidance showed a significantly reduced positivity in the correlate of conscious recollection, and switching instructions reversed the ERP effect even for items that had been previously repeatedly recalled, suggesting that voluntary control processes can override highly practiced, automatic recollection. Avoiding recollection of particularly prepotent memories was associated with an additional, earlier ERP negativity that was separable from the later voluntary modulation of conscious recollection. The findings have implications for theories of memory retrieval by highlighting the involvement of voluntary attentional processes in controlling conscious recollection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18702575     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  EEG evidence that morally relevant autobiographical memories can be suppressed.

Authors:  Akul Satish; Robin Hellerstedt; Michael C Anderson; Zara M Bergström
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.526

2.  Intentional suppression can lead to a reduction of memory strength: behavioral and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  Gerd T Waldhauser; Magnus Lindgren; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-16

3.  Tracking the intrusion of unwanted memories into awareness with event-related potentials.

Authors:  Robin Hellerstedt; Mikael Johansson; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  ERP evidence for the control of emotional memories during strategic retrieval.

Authors:  Jane E Herron
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Successfully controlling intrusive memories is harder when control must be sustained.

Authors:  Kevin van Schie; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-02-21

6.  Intentional retrieval suppression can conceal guilty knowledge in ERP memory detection tests.

Authors:  Zara M Bergström; Michael C Anderson; Marie Buda; Jon S Simons; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting.

Authors:  Michael C Anderson; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Behavioral and EEG Evidence for Auditory Memory Suppression.

Authors:  Maya E Cano; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met Polymorphism Is Associated With a Reduced ERP Component Indexing Emotional Recollection.

Authors:  Rhiannon Jones; Gavin Craig; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-21

10.  Does retrieving a memory insulate it against memory inhibition? A retroactive interference study.

Authors:  Justin C Hulbert; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2020-01-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.