Literature DB >> 18702403

How can history of science matter to scientists?

Jane Maienschein1, Manfred Laubichler, Andrea Loettgers.   

Abstract

History of science has developed into a methodologically diverse discipline, adding greatly to our understanding of the interplay between science, society, and culture. Along the way, one original impetus for the then newly emerging discipline--what George Sarton called the perspective "from the point of view of the scientist"--dropped out of fashion. This essay shows, by means of several examples, that reclaiming this interaction between science and history of science yields interesting perspectives and new insights for both science and history of science. The authors consequently suggest that historians of science also adopt this perspective as part of their methodological repertoire.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18702403     DOI: 10.1086/588692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isis        ISSN: 0021-1753            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

1.  The Embryo Project: an integrated approach to history, practices, and social contexts of embryo research.

Authors:  Jane Maienschein; Manfred D Laubichler
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.326

2.  Communication: Metaphors advance scientific research.

Authors:  Andrea Loettgers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Risk assessment and communication tools for genotype associations with multifactorial phenotypes: the concept of "edge effect" and cultivating an ethical bridge between omics innovations and society.

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Raphaëlle Stenne; Andrew A Somogyi; Toshiyuki Someya; S Oğuz Kayaalp; Eugene Kolker
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2009-02

Review 4.  Why Study the History of Neuroscience?

Authors:  Richard E Brown
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.