BACKGROUND: Hepatoid carcinoma is a rare, primary neoplasm of the ovary characterized by histologic, immunobistochemical and analytical evidence of hepatic differentiation. Reflecting the rarity of this entity, few cytologic descriptions are available. CASE: A 65-year-old woman presented with an abdominopelvic mass, peritoneal implants and elevated levels of CA-125 and a-fetoprotein (AFP). Cytologic examination of the ascitic fluid revealed cellular samples of polygonal cells in trabecular and papillary groups. Neoplastic cells were predominantly monomorphous, but some groups exhibited marked cellular atypia. A few trabecular groups showed peripheral endothelial rimming. Histologically, the neoplasm had evident hepatocellular differentiation, with a solid, trabecular growth of polygonal, eosinophilic cells with well-defined boundaries. The cells were immunoreactive with keratins, AFP and HepPar1. Retrospectively, HepPar1 was tested in cytologic samples, with a positive result. CONCLUSION: As occurs with other hepatocellular neoplasms, the hepatic differentiation that characterizes this unusual neoplasm may not be easily recognizable in effusion samples. However, there are some features that, in addition to an elevated AFP value, may help to suggest the diagnosis. A predominant trabecular arrangement with occasional endothelial rimming and HepPar1 immunoreactivity, consistent with hepatic differentiation, are unusual in common surface epithelial ovarian tumors.
BACKGROUND:Hepatoid carcinoma is a rare, primary neoplasm of the ovary characterized by histologic, immunobistochemical and analytical evidence of hepatic differentiation. Reflecting the rarity of this entity, few cytologic descriptions are available. CASE: A 65-year-old woman presented with an abdominopelvic mass, peritoneal implants and elevated levels of CA-125 and a-fetoprotein (AFP). Cytologic examination of the ascitic fluid revealed cellular samples of polygonal cells in trabecular and papillary groups. Neoplastic cells were predominantly monomorphous, but some groups exhibited marked cellular atypia. A few trabecular groups showed peripheral endothelial rimming. Histologically, the neoplasm had evident hepatocellular differentiation, with a solid, trabecular growth of polygonal, eosinophilic cells with well-defined boundaries. The cells were immunoreactive with keratins, AFP and HepPar1. Retrospectively, HepPar1 was tested in cytologic samples, with a positive result. CONCLUSION: As occurs with other hepatocellular neoplasms, the hepatic differentiation that characterizes this unusual neoplasm may not be easily recognizable in effusion samples. However, there are some features that, in addition to an elevated AFP value, may help to suggest the diagnosis. A predominant trabecular arrangement with occasional endothelial rimming and HepPar1 immunoreactivity, consistent with hepatic differentiation, are unusual in common surface epithelial ovarian tumors.