Literature DB >> 18701430

Estimation of phylogenetic inconsistencies in the three domains of life.

Victor Soria-Carrasco1, Jose Castresana.   

Abstract

Discrepancies in phylogenetic trees of bacteria and archaea are often explained as lateral gene transfer events. However, such discrepancies may also be due to phylogenetic artifacts or orthology assignment problems. A first step that may help to resolve this dilemma is to estimate the extent of phylogenetic inconsistencies in trees of prokaryotes in comparison with those of higher eukaryotes, where no lateral gene transfer is expected. To test this, we used 21 proteomes each of eukaryotes (mainly opisthokonts), proteobacteria, and archaea that spanned equivalent levels of genetic divergence. In each domain of life, we defined a set of putative orthologous sequences using a phylogenetic-based orthology protocol and, as a reference topology, we used a tree constructed with concatenated genes of each domain. Our results show, for most of the tests performed, that the magnitude of topological inconsistencies with respect to the reference tree was very similar in the trees of proteobacteria and eukaryotes. When clade support was taken into account, prokaryotes showed some more inconsistencies, but then all values were very low. Discrepancies were only consistently higher in archaea but, as shown by simulation analysis, this is likely due to the particular tree of the archaeal species used here being more difficult to reconstruct, whereas the trees of proteobacteria and eukaryotes were of similar difficulty. Although these results are based on a relatively small number of genes, it seems that phylogenetic reconstruction problems, including orthology assignment problems, have a similar overall effect over prokaryotic and eukaryotic trees based on single genes. Consequently, lateral gene transfer between distant prokaryotic species may have been more rare than previously thought, which opens the way to obtain the tree of life of bacterial and archaeal species using genomic data and the concatenation of adequate genes, in the same way as it is usually done in eukaryotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18701430     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  9 in total

1.  The practice of classification and the theory of evolution, and what the demise of Charles Darwin's tree of life hypothesis means for both of them.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The conflict between horizontal gene transfer and the safeguard of identity: origin of meiotic sexuality.

Authors:  Nicolas Glansdorff; Ying Xu; Bernard Labedan
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Genome-wide comparative analysis of phylogenetic trees: the prokaryotic forest of life.

Authors:  Pere Puigbò; Yuri I Wolf; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

4.  The evolutionary history of lysine biosynthesis pathways within eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guifré Torruella; Hiroshi Suga; Marta Riutort; Juli Peretó; Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  ColorTree: a batch customization tool for phylogenic trees.

Authors:  Wei-Hua Chen; Martin J Lercher
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-07-31

Review 6.  Trees and networks before and after Darwin.

Authors:  Mark A Ragan
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Controversies in modern evolutionary biology: the imperative for error detection and quality control.

Authors:  Francisco Prosdocimi; Benjamin Linard; Pierre Pontarotti; Olivier Poch; Julie D Thompson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Orthology inference in nonmodel organisms using transcriptomes and low-coverage genomes: improving accuracy and matrix occupancy for phylogenomics.

Authors:  Ya Yang; Stephen A Smith
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things.

Authors:  Eric Bapteste; Maureen A O'Malley; Robert G Beiko; Marc Ereshefsky; J Peter Gogarten; Laura Franklin-Hall; François-Joseph Lapointe; John Dupré; Tal Dagan; Yan Boucher; William Martin
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.540

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.