Literature DB >> 18700201

The paradox of enrichment in an adaptive world.

Akihiko Mougi1, Kinya Nishimura.   

Abstract

Paradoxically, enrichment can destabilize a predator-prey food web. While adaptive dynamics can greatly influence the stability of interaction systems, few theoretical studies have examined the effect of the adaptive dynamics of interaction-related traits on the possibility of resolution of the paradox of enrichment. We consider the evolution of attack and defence traits of a predator and two prey species in a one predator-two prey system in which the predator practises optimal diet use. The results showed that optimal foraging alone cannot eliminate a pattern of destabilization with enrichment, but trait evolution of the predator or prey can change the pattern to one of stabilization, implying a possible resolution of the paradox of enrichment. Furthermore, trait evolution in all species can broaden the parameter range of stabilization. Importantly, rapid evolution can stabilize this system, but weaken its stability in the face of enrichment.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18700201      PMCID: PMC2605811          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Group selection in predator-prey communities.

Authors:  M E Gilpin
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1975

2.  Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability.

Authors:  Michio Kondoh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Adaptive plasticity in ontogenetic niche shifts stabilizes consumer-resource dynamics.

Authors:  Gaku Takimoto
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice.

Authors:  Brian O Ma; Peter A Abrams; Chad E Brassil
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  Does mutual interference always stabilize predator-prey dynamics? A comparison of models.

Authors:  Roger Arditi; Jean-Marc Callois; Yuri Tyutyunov; Christian Jost
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.583

6.  A resolution of the paradox of enrichment.

Authors:  Akihiko Mougi; Kinya Nishimura
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Anti-predator defence and the complexity-stability relationship of food webs.

Authors:  Michio Kondoh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time.

Authors:  M L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Coevolution in a one predator-two prey system.

Authors:  Akihiko Mougi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Scrounging by foragers can resolve the paradox of enrichment.

Authors:  Wataru Toyokawa
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Population cycles emerging through multiple interaction types.

Authors:  Naoya Mitani; Akihiko Mougi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Paradox of enrichment: A fractional differential approach with memory.

Authors:  Sourav Rana; Sabyasachi Bhattacharya; Joydeep Pal; Gaston M N'Guérékata; Joydev Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Physica A       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  Producing and scrounging can have stabilizing effects at multiple levels of organization.

Authors:  William L Vickery
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.