E Bora1, M Yucel, A Fornito, M Berk, C Pantelis. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, and Melbourne Health, ORYGEN research Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. boremre@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evidence related to overlapping clinical and genetic risk factors in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BD) have raised concerns about the validity of 'Kraepelinian dichotomy'. As controversies mainly arise in mixed psychoses that occupy the intermediate zone between schizophrenia and BD, investigating neurobiological markers of mixed psychoses may be relevant to understanding the nature of psychotic disorders. METHOD: In this article, we review studies comparing magnetic resonance imaging, neuropsychological and electrophysiological findings in mixed psychoses with each other, as well as with more prototypical cases of schizophrenia and BD. RESULTS: The evidence reviewed suggests that mixed psychoses may be associated with different genetic and neurobiological markers compared with prototypical forms of schizophrenia and BD. CONCLUSION: These findings may be compatible with more sophisticated versions of dimensional and continuum models or, alternatively, they may suggest that there is an intermediate third category between prototypical schizophrenia and BD.
OBJECTIVE: Evidence related to overlapping clinical and genetic risk factors in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BD) have raised concerns about the validity of 'Kraepelinian dichotomy'. As controversies mainly arise in mixed psychoses that occupy the intermediate zone between schizophrenia and BD, investigating neurobiological markers of mixed psychoses may be relevant to understanding the nature of psychotic disorders. METHOD: In this article, we review studies comparing magnetic resonance imaging, neuropsychological and electrophysiological findings in mixed psychoses with each other, as well as with more prototypical cases of schizophrenia and BD. RESULTS: The evidence reviewed suggests that mixed psychoses may be associated with different genetic and neurobiological markers compared with prototypical forms of schizophrenia and BD. CONCLUSION: These findings may be compatible with more sophisticated versions of dimensional and continuum models or, alternatively, they may suggest that there is an intermediate third category between prototypical schizophrenia and BD.
Authors: Suzanne N Avery; Lisa E Williams; Austin A Woolard; Stephan Heckers Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Eva M Meisenzahl; Stefan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Thomas Frodl; Joseph Kambeitz; Yanis Köhler; Peter Falkai; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Maximilian Reiser; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Brain Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: I V Vahia; B W Palmer; C Depp; I Fellows; S Golshan; H C Kraemer; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Cagri Yüksel; Julie McCarthy; Ann Shinn; Danielle L Pfaff; Justin T Baker; Stephan Heckers; Perry Renshaw; Dost Ongür Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Chaya B Gopin; Katherine E Burdick; Pamela Derosse; Terry E Goldberg; Anil K Malhotra Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Carmen Simonsen; Kjetil Sundet; Anja Vaskinn; Astrid B Birkenaes; John A Engh; Ann Faerden; Halldóra Jónsdóttir; Petter Andreas Ringen; Stein Opjordsmoen; Ingrid Melle; Svein Friis; Ole A Andreassen Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 9.306