Literature DB >> 18699795

Halothane-anaesthetized, closed-chest, guinea-pig model for assessment of drug-induced QT-interval prolongation.

Yasue Sakaguchi1, Akira Takahara, Yuji Nakamura, Yasuki Akie, Atsushi Sugiyama.   

Abstract

For the halothane-anaesthetized, closed-chest, guinea-pig model, corrected QT interval (QTc) has been empirically used to estimate the extent of drug-induced QT-interval prolongation. In the present study, we employed an atrial pacing method to clarify a net effect of a drug on the QT interval in this model. The atrial pacing catheter was inserted via the jugular vein with a minimal surgical invasion, and the effects of d-sotalol (0.3 and 3 mg/kg, intravenously) and verapamil (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg, intravenously) on electrocardiogram parameters were assessed under the sinus rhythm and during the atrial pacing of 200 and 240 beats/min. d-Sotalol significantly prolonged the QT interval in a reverse use-dependent manner and decreased the heart rate, while verapamil prolonged the PR interval without affecting the heart rate or QT interval, indicating the sensitivity and specificity of this model in assessing the pharmacodynamics of the drug-induced QT-interval prolongation. Using the QT/RR relationship under the sinus rhythm, we obtained the following two types of QT-interval correcting formulae; namely, QTc = QT - 0.207(RR - 300) by a linear regression method; and QTc = QT/(RR/300)0.332 by a non-linear regression method, the latter of which is equal to 0.67 times of Fridericia's formula, providing rationale for the use of mathematical correction in this model. Thus, the halothane-anaesthetized, closed-chest, guinea-pig model may be highly useful for assessing the drug-induced QT-interval prolongation, which may become an alternative to current models for the in vivo QT assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18699795     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00312.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  3 in total

1.  Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length.

Authors:  Wesam Mulla; Roni Gillis; Michael Murninkas; Hadar Klapper-Goldstein; Hovav Gabay; Michal Mor; Sigal Elyagon; Noah Liel-Cohen; Olivier Bernus; Yoram Etzion
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  In vivo characterization of rate-dependent impact on the QT interval of microminipig assessed by atrial electrical pacing: Development of correction formulae of QT interval.

Authors:  Ryuichi Kambayashi; Mihoko Hagiwara-Nagasawa; Ai Goto; Koki Chiba; Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko; Atsuhiko T Naito; Akio Matsumoto; Atsushi Sugiyama
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 3.  Golden Standard or Obsolete Method? Review of ECG Applications in Clinical and Experimental Context.

Authors:  Tibor Stracina; Marina Ronzhina; Richard Redina; Marie Novakova
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.