Literature DB >> 18698523

Auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing adults: a test-retest reliability study.

Wendy D'Haenens1, Bart M Vinck, Eddy De Vel, Leen Maes, Annelies Bockstael, Hannah Keppler, Birgit Philips, Freya Swinnen, Ingeborg Dhooge.   

Abstract

The test-retest reliability of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has received limited attention. Therefore, the aim was to assess the test-retest reliability of an 80-Hz multiple-ASSR system in normal-hearing subjects by a comprehensive set of statistical methods. Twenty-nine participants (15 females) aged between 18 and 30 years contributed to two sessions (test-retest), and the ASSR thresholds were determined with a descending search protocol using a 10-dB precision. The test-retest reliability was assessed by a three-layered approach which consisted of Pearson product-moment correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and standard error of measurement (SEM). The correlations for ASSR thresholds ranged from poor (0.34) for 500 Hz CF to moderate (0.55) for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz CF. A two-way ANOVA of the difference scores (ASSR threshold minus behavioral threshold) demonstrated no significant difference between test and retest. The SEM determined the normal tolerance for clinical error of repeated thresholds and the ASSR SEM values fell well within +/-10 dB HL. This investigation shows that the multiple ASSR-technique produces a clinically acceptable test-retest reliability for normal-hearing adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18698523     DOI: 10.1080/14992020802116136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  8 in total

1.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The statistical basis for serial monitoring in audiology.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Kelly M Reavis; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.

Authors:  Timothy S Wilding; Colette M McKay; Richard J Baker; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

5.  On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system.

Authors:  Gerard Encina-Llamas; Torsten Dau; Bastian Epp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  P H DeJonckere; J Lebacq
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-05-29

7.  Test-Retest Reliability of Word Recognition Score Using Korean Standard Monosyllabic Word Lists for Adults as a Function of the Number of Test Words.

Authors:  Jinsook Kim; Junghak Lee; Kyoung Won Lee; Junghwa Bahng; Jae Hee Lee; Chul-Hee Choi; Soo Jin Cho; Eun Yeong Shin; Jeonghye Park
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira Beck; Bernardo Faria Ramos; Signe Schuster Grasel; Henrique Faria Ramos; Maria Flávia Bonadia B de Moraes; Edigar Rezende de Almeida; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.