Literature DB >> 18698236

MOC-PS(SM) CME article: patient safety in the office-based setting.

J Bauer Horton1, Jeffrey E Janis, Rod J Rohrich.   

Abstract

LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discern the importance of the physician's office administrative structure. 2. Recognize the necessity of a system for quality assessment. 3. Assess which procedures are safe in the office-based setting. 4. Know the basic steps for properly evaluating patients for office-based plastic surgery.
SUMMARY: This article reviews the literature on office-based patient safety issues. It places special emphasis on the statements and advisories published by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' Convened Task Force on Patient Safety in the Office-Based Setting. The article divides patient safety in the health care delivery system into four broad categories. First, patient safety starts with emphasis at the administrative level. The physician or independent governing body must develop a system of quality assessment that functions to minimize preventable errors and report outcomes and errors. Second, the clinical aspects of patient safety require that the physician evaluate whether the procedure(s) and the patient are proper for the office setting. Third, this article gives special attention to liposuction, the most frequently performed office-based plastic surgery procedure. Finally, the article reviews the management of postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. Patient safety must be every physician's highest priority, as reflected in the Hippocratic Oath: primum non nocere ("first, do no harm").

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18698236     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318183c118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Assessing patient safety in Canadian ambulatory surgery facilities: A national survey.

Authors:  Jamil Ahmad; Olivia A Ho; Wayne W Carman; Achilles Thoma; Donald H Lalonde; Frank Lista
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Preauricular Aging: A Three-Point Grading System to Guide Treatment in Facial Rejuvenation.

Authors:  O Friedman; O Artzi; O Haran
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  "A Sign of Things to Come: Training Research Output Long-Term Scholarship in Academic Plastic Surgery."

Authors:  Alexander I Murphy; Joseph A Mellia; Fortunay Diatta; Kevin M Klifto; Martin P Morris; John P Fischer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Response to "Lessons Learned from a National Cosmetic Surgery Insurance Database".

Authors:  Varun Gupta; Julian Winocour; Max Yeslev; R Bruce Shack; James C Grotting; K Kye Higdon
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Buried umbilicus with inflammation due to retained rubber foreign body after liposuction: A case report.

Authors:  Jong-Lim Kim; Jin Yong Shin; Si-Gyun Roh; Suk Choo Chang; Nae-Ho Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.