Literature DB >> 18698155

Differential acetylation of histone H4 lysine during development of in vitro fertilized, cloned and parthenogenetically activated bovine embryos.

Walid E Maalouf1, Ramiro Alberio, Keith H S Campbell.   

Abstract

The oocyte is remarkable in its ability to remodel parental genomes following fertilization and to reprogram somatic nuclei after nuclear transfer (NT). To characterize the patterns of histone H4 acetylation and DNA methylation during development of bovine gametogenesis and embryogenesis, specific antibodies for histone H4 acetylated at lysine 5 (K5), K8, K12 and K16 residues and for methylated cytosine of CpG dinucleotides were used. Oocytes and sperm lacked the staining for histone acetylation, when DNA methylation staining was intense. In IVF zygotes, both pronuclei were transiently hyper-acetylated. However, the male pronucleus was faster in acquiring acetylated histones, and concurrently it was rapidly demethylated. Both pronuclei were equally acetylated during the S to G(2)-phase transition, while methylation staining was only still observed in the female pronucleus. In parthenogenetically activated oocytes, acetylation of the female pronucleus was enriched faster, while DNA remained methylated. A transient de-acetylation was observed in NT embryos reconstructed using a non-activated ooplast of a metaphase second arrested oocyte. Remarkably, the intensity of acetylation staining of most H4 lysine residues peaked at the 8-cell stage in IVF embryos, which coincided with zygotic genome activation and with lowest DNA methylation staining. At the blastocyst stage, trophectodermal cells of IVF and parthenogenetic embryos generally demonstrated more intense staining for most acetylated H4 lysine, whilst ICM cells stained very weakly. In contrast methylation of the DNA stained more intensely in ICM. NT blastocysts showed differential acetylation of blastomeres but not methylation. The inverse association of histone lysine acetylation and DNA methylation at different vital embryo stages suggests a mechanistically significant relationship. The complexities of these epigenetic interactions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18698155     DOI: 10.4161/epi.3.4.6497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epigenetics        ISSN: 1559-2294            Impact factor:   4.528


  18 in total

1.  Psammaplin a improves development and quality of somatic cell nuclear transfer mouse embryos.

Authors:  Anna Mallol; Josep Santaló; Elena Ibáñez
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Epigenetic disruptions of histone signatures for the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in mouse parthenogenetic embryos.

Authors:  Yi-Hui Chen; John Yu
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Mechanisms of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation remodeling during early mammalian development.

Authors:  Yanina S Bogliotti; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.528

4.  Epigenetic modification of fetal fibroblasts improves developmental competency and gene expression in porcine cloned embryos.

Authors:  B Mohana Kumar; Geun-Ho Maeng; Yeon-Mi Lee; Jeong-Hyeon Lee; Byeong-Gyun Jeon; Sun-A Ock; Taeyoung Kang; Gyu-Jin Rho
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Histone modifications and mRNA expression in the inner cell mass and trophectoderm of bovine blastocysts.

Authors:  Doris Herrmann; John Arne Dahl; Andrea Lucas-Hahn; Philippe Collas; Heiner Niemann
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.528

6.  Placental development during early pregnancy in sheep: effects of embryo origin on fetal and placental growth and global methylation.

Authors:  Anna T Grazul-Bilska; Mary Lynn Johnson; Pawel P Borowicz; Loren Baranko; Dale A Redmer; Lawrence P Reynolds
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Epigenetic disorders and altered gene expression after use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in domestic cattle.

Authors:  Rodrigo Urrego; Nélida Rodriguez-Osorio; Heiner Niemann
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Chromatin modifying agents in the in vitro production of bovine embryos.

Authors:  Fabio Morato Monteiro; Clara Slade Oliveira; Letícia Zoccolaro Oliveira; Naiara Zoccal Saraiva; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Flavia Lombardi Lopes; Daniel Robert Arnold; Joaquim Mansano Garcia
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2010-09-29

9.  Localization of DNA methyltransferase-1 during oocyte differentiation, in vitro maturation and early embryonic development in cow.

Authors:  V Lodde; S C Modina; F Franciosi; E Zuccari; I Tessaro; A M Luciano
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.188

10.  A simplified approach for oocyte enucleation in mammalian cloning.

Authors:  Domenico Iuso; Marta Czernik; Federica Zacchini; Grazyna Ptak; Pasqualino Loi
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.