PURPOSE: After DNA damage, checkpoints pathways are activated in the cells to halt the cell cycle, thus ensuring repair or inducing cell death. To better investigate the role of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) in cellular response to different anticancer agents, Chk1 was knocked down in HCT-116 cell line and in its p53-deficient subline by using small interfering RNAs (siRNA). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Chk1 was abrogated by transient transfection of specific siRNA against it, and stable tetracycline-inducible Chk1 siRNA clones were obtained transfecting cells with a plasmid expressing two siRNA against Chk1. The validated inducible system was then translated in an in vivo setting by transplanting the inducible clones in nude mice. RESULTS: Transient Chk1 down-regulation sensitized HCT-116 cells, p53-/- more than the p53 wild-type counterpart, to DNA-damaging agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and etoposide treatments, with no modification of Taxol and PS341 cytotoxic activities. Inhibition of Chk1 protein levels in inducible clones on induction with doxycycline correlated with an increased cisplatin and 5-FU activity. Such effect was more evident in a p53-deficient background. These clones were transplanted in nude mice and a clear Chk1 down-regulation was shown in tumor samples of mice given tetracycline in the drinking water by immunohistochemical detection of Chk1 protein. More importantly, an increased 5-FU antitumor activity was found in tumors with the double Chk1 and p53 silencing. CONCLUSIONS: These findings corroborate the fact that Chk1 protein is a molecular target to be inhibited in tumors with a defective G1 checkpoint to increase the selectivity of anticancer treatments.
PURPOSE: After DNA damage, checkpoints pathways are activated in the cells to halt the cell cycle, thus ensuring repair or inducing cell death. To better investigate the role of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) in cellular response to different anticancer agents, Chk1 was knocked down in HCT-116 cell line and in its p53-deficient subline by using small interfering RNAs (siRNA). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Chk1 was abrogated by transient transfection of specific siRNA against it, and stable tetracycline-inducible Chk1 siRNA clones were obtained transfecting cells with a plasmid expressing two siRNA against Chk1. The validated inducible system was then translated in an in vivo setting by transplanting the inducible clones in nude mice. RESULTS: Transient Chk1 down-regulation sensitized HCT-116 cells, p53-/- more than the p53 wild-type counterpart, to DNA-damaging agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and etoposide treatments, with no modification of Taxol and PS341 cytotoxic activities. Inhibition of Chk1 protein levels in inducible clones on induction with doxycycline correlated with an increased cisplatin and 5-FU activity. Such effect was more evident in a p53-deficient background. These clones were transplanted in nude mice and a clear Chk1 down-regulation was shown in tumor samples of mice given tetracycline in the drinking water by immunohistochemical detection of Chk1 protein. More importantly, an increased 5-FU antitumor activity was found in tumors with the double Chk1 and p53 silencing. CONCLUSIONS: These findings corroborate the fact that Chk1 protein is a molecular target to be inhibited in tumors with a defective G1 checkpoint to increase the selectivity of anticancer treatments.
Authors: Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Lili Zhao; Joshua D Parsels; Mary A Davis; Maria C Hassan; Sankari Arumugarajah; Linda Hylander-Gans; Deborah Morosini; Diane M Simeone; Christine E Canman; Daniel P Normolle; Sonya D Zabludoff; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Oliver Riesterer; Fumihiko Matsumoto; Li Wang; Jessica Pickett; David Molkentine; Uma Giri; Luka Milas; Uma Raju Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Amelia M Huehls; Jill M Wagner; Catherine J Huntoon; Liyi Geng; Charles Erlichman; Anand G Patel; Scott H Kaufmann; Larry M Karnitz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Elke Malzer; Marie-Louise Daly; Aileen Moloney; Timothy J Sendall; Sally E Thomas; Edward Ryder; Hyung Don Ryoo; Damian C Crowther; David A Lomas; Stefan J Marciniak Journal: J Cell Sci Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Sean Vance; Erqi Liu; Lili Zhao; Joshua D Parsels; Leslie A Parsels; Jeffery L Brown; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Benjamin P Soule; Nicole L Simone; William G DeGraff; Rajani Choudhuri; John A Cook; James B Mitchell Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 3.481