Literature DB >> 18697936

Paleoindian demography and the extraterrestrial impact hypothesis.

Briggs Buchanan1, Mark Collard, Kevan Edinborough.   

Abstract

Recently it has been suggested that one or more large extraterrestrial (ET) objects struck northern North America 12,900 +/- 100 calendar years before present (calBP) [Firestone RB, et al. (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16016-16021]. This impact is claimed to have triggered the Younger Dryas major cooling event and resulted in the extinction of the North American megafauna. The impact is also claimed to have caused major cultural changes and population decline among the Paleoindians. Here, we report a study in which approximately 1,500 radiocarbon dates from archaeological sites in Canada and the United States were used to test the hypothesis that the ET resulted in population decline among the Paleoindians. Following recent studies [e.g., Gamble C, Davies W, Pettitt P, Hazelwood L, Richards M (2005) Camb Archaeol J 15:193-223), the summed probability distribution of the calibrated dates was used to identify probable changes in human population size between 15,000 and 9,000 calBP. Subsequently, potential biases were evaluated by modeling and spatial analysis of the dated occupations. The results of the analyses were not consistent with the predictions of extraterrestrial impact hypothesis. No evidence of a population decline among the Paleoindians at 12,900 +/- 100 calBP was found. Thus, minimally, the study suggests the extraterrestrial impact hypothesis should be amended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18697936      PMCID: PMC2575318          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803762105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Global archaeological evidence for proboscidean overkill.

Authors:  Todd Surovell; Nicole Waguespack; P Jeffrey Brantingham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Redefining the age of Clovis: implications for the peopling of the Americas.

Authors:  Michael R Waters; Thomas W Stafford
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evidence for an extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megafaunal extinctions and the Younger Dryas cooling.

Authors:  R B Firestone; A West; J P Kennett; L Becker; T E Bunch; Z S Revay; P H Schultz; T Belgya; D J Kennett; J M Erlandson; O J Dickenson; A C Goodyear; R S Harris; G A Howard; J B Kloosterman; P Lechler; P A Mayewski; J Montgomery; R Poreda; T Darrah; S S Que Hee; A R Smith; A Stich; W Topping; J H Wittke; W S Wolbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spatial gradients in Clovis-age radiocarbon dates across North America suggest rapid colonization from the north.

Authors:  Marcus J Hamilton; Briggs Buchanan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas.

Authors:  Ted Goebel; Michael R Waters; Dennis H O'Rourke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Younger Dryas "black mats" and the Rancholabrean termination in North America.

Authors:  C Vance Haynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America.

Authors:  M Thomas P Gilbert; Dennis L Jenkins; Anders Götherstrom; Nuria Naveran; Juan J Sanchez; Michael Hofreiter; Philip Francis Thomsen; Jonas Binladen; Thomas F G Higham; Robert M Yohe; Robert Parr; Linda Scott Cummings; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A three-stage colonization model for the peopling of the Americas.

Authors:  Andrew Kitchen; Michael M Miyamoto; Connie J Mulligan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  20 in total

1.  Accumulation of impact markers in desert wetlands and implications for the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Pigati; Claudio Latorre; Jason A Rech; Julio L Betancourt; Katherine E Martínez; James R Budahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatiotemporal distribution of Holocene populations in North America.

Authors:  Michelle A Chaput; Björn Kriesche; Matthew Betts; Andrew Martindale; Rafal Kulik; Volker Schmidt; Konrad Gajewski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  California archaeological record consistent with Younger Dryas disruptive event.

Authors:  Terry L Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Crude demographic proxy reveals nothing about Paleoindian population.

Authors:  Brendan J Culleton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Southeastern data inconsistent with Paleoindian demographic reconstruction.

Authors:  David G Anderson; Scott C Meeks; Albert C Goodyear; D Shane Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Standards of evidence and Paleoindian demographics.

Authors:  Douglas J Kennett; Thomas W Stafford; John Southon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Biostratigraphic evidence supports Paleoindian population disruption at approximately 12.9 ka.

Authors:  James P Kennett; Allen West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Haplotypic background of a private allele at high frequency in the Americas.

Authors:  Kari B Schroeder; Mattias Jakobsson; Michael H Crawford; Theodore G Schurr; Simina M Boca; Donald F Conrad; Raul Y Tito; Ludmilla P Osipova; Larissa A Tarskaia; Sergey I Zhadanov; Jeffrey D Wall; Jonathan K Pritchard; Ripan S Malhi; David G Smith; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Wildfire responses to abrupt climate change in North America.

Authors:  J R Marlon; P J Bartlein; M K Walsh; S P Harrison; K J Brown; M E Edwards; P E Higuera; M J Power; R S Anderson; C Briles; A Brunelle; C Carcaillet; M Daniels; F S Hu; M Lavoie; C Long; T Minckley; P J H Richard; A C Scott; D S Shafer; W Tinner; C E Umbanhowar; C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  An independent evaluation of the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis.

Authors:  Todd A Surovell; Vance T Holliday; Joseph A M Gingerich; Caroline Ketron; C Vance Haynes; Ilene Hilman; Daniel P Wagner; Eileen Johnson; Philippe Claeys
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.