Literature DB >> 18697887

Impact of risk information on perceived colorectal cancer risk: a randomized trial.

Kathryn A Robb1, John Campbell, Philip Evans, Anne Miles, Jane Wardle.   

Abstract

The study sought to modify comparative optimism about colorectal cancer in a community sample using a method of providing risk information found to be effective in a laboratory setting. The 3185 adults from General Practice lists were randomized to three groups: (1) control--no information; (2) risk information leaflet; (3) risk and screening information leaflet. Significant comparative optimism and high numeric estimates of absolute risk were found. Risk factor information did not reduce optimistic beliefs nor modify estimates of risk. Interest in screening was high overall and not influenced by the information. Comparatively optimistic risk perceptions appear resistant to change in community settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18697887     DOI: 10.1177/1359105308093858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  5 in total

1.  An examination of the relationship of patient modifiable and non-modifiable characteristics with fear of cancer recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Julie M Cessna Palas; Kelly A Hyland; Ashley M Nelson; Brent J Small; Heather S L Jim; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Changes in risk perceptions in relation to self-reported colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer cases enrolled in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Alison K Herrmann; Catherine M Crespi; Cynthia M Mojica; L Cindy Chang; Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  The effect of a supplementary ('Gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Rosalind Raine; Austin Obichere; Michael S Wolf; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-09-25

4.  Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication.

Authors:  Samantha L Quaife; Laura A V Marlow; Andy McEwen; Samuel M Janes; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers.

Authors:  S G Smith; L M McGregor; R Raine; J Wardle; C von Wagner; K A Robb
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.