A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy.

BACKGROUND: The availability of haemodialysis machines equipped with on-line clearance monitoring (OCM) allows frequent assessment of dialysis efficiency and adequacy without the need for blood samples. Accurate estimation of the urea distribution volume 'V' is required for Kt/V calculated from OCM to be consistent with conventional blood sample-based methods.
METHODS: Ten stable HD patients were monitored monthly for 6 months. Time-averaged OCM clearance (K(OCM)) and pre- and post-dialysis blood samples were collected at each monitored session. The second generation Daugirdas formula was used to calculate the single-pool variable volume Kt/V, (Kt/V)(D). Values of V to allow comparison between OCM and blood-based Kt/V were determined from Watson's formula (V(Watson)), bioimpedance spectroscopy (V(BIS)), classical urea kinetic modelling (V(UKM_C)) and a simple computation of V (V(UKM_S)) from the blood-based Kt/V and K(OCM)t.
RESULTS: Comparison of K(OCM)t/V with (Kt/V)(D) shows that using V(Watson) leads to significant systematic underestimation of dialysis dose. K(OCM)t/V(BIS) agrees with (Kt/V)(D) to within +/- 10%. K(OCM)t/V(UKM_S) is, by definition, identical to (Kt/V)(D) when initially calculated. However, if a historical value of V is used, agreement between K(OCM)t/V and (Kt/V)(D) over 6 months varies by 5% for V(BIS) and 10% for V(UKM_S).
CONCLUSIONS: When investigating the effect of different treatment strategies on dialysis efficiency, any estimate of V can be used provided it is constant, as K is the relevant parameter. When frequent supervision of actual dialysis dose is required, the greatest consistency between K(OCM)t/V and the reference, Kt/V(D), over time is achieved with V(BIS).