BACKGROUND: It is common practice to take a specimen of pus for microscopy and bacterial culture during drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if routine culture and sensitivity had any therapeutic value in the care of patients with non-perianal cutaneous abscesses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis ofall patients undergoing drainage ofa cutaneous abscess during a two year period (June 2003 - June 2005) was performed. Patients were identified from the hospital database and theatre records, and those with perianal, pilonidal or surgical wound sepsis were excluded. Notes were reviewed for clinical details, culture results, subsequent admissions and attendance at follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 239 patients treated during this period, 74 patients had 77 operations to drain abscesses that matched the inclusion criteria. Specimens were sent from 52 (67.5%) procedures. Only 65.4% had an organism identified, of which methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most commonly isolated organism (36.5%). Forty-one point six per cent of patients received antibiotics as part of their treatment. The results of the bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivities were not known prior to discharge of any patient. CONCLUSION: This study shows that bacteriology swabs are frequently taken during incision and drainage of non-perianal cutaneous abscesses and had little impact on the subsequent treatment, though these results may not be applicable to immune-compromised patients.
BACKGROUND: It is common practice to take a specimen of pus for microscopy and bacterial culture during drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if routine culture and sensitivity had any therapeutic value in the care of patients with non-perianal cutaneous abscesses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis ofall patients undergoing drainage ofa cutaneous abscess during a two year period (June 2003 - June 2005) was performed. Patients were identified from the hospital database and theatre records, and those with perianal, pilonidal or surgical wound sepsis were excluded. Notes were reviewed for clinical details, culture results, subsequent admissions and attendance at follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 239 patients treated during this period, 74 patients had 77 operations to drain abscesses that matched the inclusion criteria. Specimens were sent from 52 (67.5%) procedures. Only 65.4% had an organism identified, of which methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most commonly isolated organism (36.5%). Forty-one point six per cent of patients received antibiotics as part of their treatment. The results of the bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivities were not known prior to discharge of any patient. CONCLUSION: This study shows that bacteriology swabs are frequently taken during incision and drainage of non-perianal cutaneous abscesses and had little impact on the subsequent treatment, though these results may not be applicable to immune-compromised patients.