BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of patients regarding pain-related cognitive-behavioral mechanisms, such as pain-avoidance and pain-persistence patterns, has been proposed to underlie varying treatment outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of a screening instrument to discriminate between pain-persistence and pain-avoidance patterns in FM. METHOD: In a three-part study, a self-reported screening instrument that assesses pain-avoidance behavior was used to distinguish patients with pain-persistence and pain-avoidance patterns. The resultant groups were compared with regard to several pain-related cognitive-behavioral factors, performance on a physical fitness test, and with regard to the judgments of trained therapists based on a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: The validity of the screening instrument to distinguish between pain-avoidance and pain-persistence patterns was supported by other validated self-report questionnaires for pain-related cognitive-behavioral factors, physical exercise tests, as well as by a high correspondence with blinded therapist judgment after intake assessments. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a short self-report screening instrument can be used to distinguish between pain-avoidance and pain-persistence patterns within the heterogeneous population of FM patients, which offers promising possibilities to improve treatment efficacy by tailoring treatment to specific patient patterns.
BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of patients regarding pain-related cognitive-behavioral mechanisms, such as pain-avoidance and pain-persistence patterns, has been proposed to underlie varying treatment outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of a screening instrument to discriminate between pain-persistence and pain-avoidance patterns in FM. METHOD: In a three-part study, a self-reported screening instrument that assesses pain-avoidance behavior was used to distinguish patients with pain-persistence and pain-avoidance patterns. The resultant groups were compared with regard to several pain-related cognitive-behavioral factors, performance on a physical fitness test, and with regard to the judgments of trained therapists based on a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: The validity of the screening instrument to distinguish between pain-avoidance and pain-persistence patterns was supported by other validated self-report questionnaires for pain-related cognitive-behavioral factors, physical exercise tests, as well as by a high correspondence with blinded therapist judgment after intake assessments. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a short self-report screening instrument can be used to distinguish between pain-avoidance and pain-persistence patterns within the heterogeneous population of FM patients, which offers promising possibilities to improve treatment efficacy by tailoring treatment to specific patient patterns.
Authors: Holly Schleicher; Carmen Alonso; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff; Daniel Muller; Barbara L Loevinger; Christopher L Coe Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2005 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Jo Nijs; Nathalie Roussel; Jessica Van Oosterwijck; Margot De Kooning; Kelly Ickmans; Filip Struyf; Mira Meeus; Mari Lundberg Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Madelon den Boeft; Danielle Huisman; Johannes C van der Wouden; Mattijs E Numans; Henriette E van der Horst; Peter L Lucassen; Tim C Olde Hartman Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Blanco Sheila; Luque-Reca Octavio; Catala Patricia; Bedmar Dolores; Velasco Lilian; Peñacoba Cecilia Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-14 Impact factor: 3.390