Literature DB >> 18696035

[Modern magnetic resonance procedures for assessing tumor response].

T Persigehl1, W Heindel, C Bremer.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a mainstay in oncological imaging with respect to tumor detection, characterization and treatment monitoring. Besides quantifying metric changes of tumor tissue, a wide range of different other surrogate parameters of therapy response can be imaged and quantified by MRI. Early monitoring of treatment success is critical both for medical and economical reasons specifically with more expensive target-specific drugs entering the clinical arena. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and steady state MRI can help to assess tumor perfusion and vessel permeability. The cellular state of tissue can be measured by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and metabolic changes can be monitored by MR spectroscopy (MRS). New target-specific contrast agents potentially allow selective imaging of apoptotic events.This review aims to give a brief overview of new MR-based imaging approaches to assess tumor response to new target-specific therapy regimes, with special emphasis on anti-angiogenic and antivascular treatment effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18696035     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1728-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  30 in total

1.  Alterations of intratumoral pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in head and neck carcinoma during simultaneous radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  H P Schlemmer; M Becker; P Bachert; A Dietz; V Rudat; B Vanselow; P Wollensack; I Zuna; M V Knopp; H Weidauer; M Wannenmacher; G van Kaick
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  MRI characterization of tumors and grading angiogenesis using macromolecular contrast media: status report.

Authors:  R Brasch; K Turetschek
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Physiologically based kinetic model of effector cell biodistribution in mammals: implications for adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  H Zhu; R J Melder; L T Baxter; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Anwar R Padhani; Shahnawaz Rasheed
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer: predicting response with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy--a pilot study at 4 T.

Authors:  Sina Meisamy; Patrick J Bolan; Eva H Baker; Robin L Bliss; Evin Gulbahce; Lenore I Everson; Michael T Nelson; Tim H Emory; Todd M Tuttle; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in clinical oncology.

Authors:  W Golder
Journal:  Onkologie       Date:  2004-06

8.  Steady-state blood volume measurements in experimental tumors with different angiogenic burdens a study in mice.

Authors:  Christoph Bremer; Mona Mustafa; Alex Bogdanov; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Alexander Petrovsky; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease.

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 10.  Technology insight: water diffusion MRI--a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Patterson; Anwar R Padhani; David J Collins
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-02-26
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Optical techniques for the molecular imaging of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Michel Eisenblätter; Carsten Höltke; Thorsten Persigehl; Christoph Bremer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  [Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen].

Authors:  C Schmid-Tannwald; M F Reiser; C J Zech
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.