Literature DB >> 18695616

Expression of collagen genes in the cones of skin in the Duroc/Yorkshire porcine model of fibroproliferative scarring.

Kathy Q Zhu1, Gretchen J Carrougher, Oliver P Couture, Christopher K Tuggle, Nicole S Gibran, Loren H Engrav.   

Abstract

During the past decades there has been minimal improvement in prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring. Reasons include the lack of a validated animal model, imprecise techniques to dissect scar into the histologic components, and limited methodology for measurement of gene expression. These problems have been addressed with the Duroc/Yorkshire model of healing, laser capture microdissection, and the Affymetrix Porcine GeneChip. Here we compared collagen gene expression in fibroproliferative healing in the Duroc breed to nonfibroproliferative healing in the Yorkshires. We made shallow and deep dorsal wounds, biopsied at 1, 2, 3, 12, and 20 weeks. We sampled the dermal cones by laser capture microdissection, extracted and amplified the RNA, and hybridized Affymetrix Porcine GeneChips. We also obtained samples of human hypertrophic scar approximately 20 weeks postinjury. Data were normalized and statistical analysis performed with mixed linear regression using the Bioconductor R/maanova package. Genes for further analysis were also restricted with four biologic criteria, including that the 20-week deep Duroc expression match the human samples. Eleven collagen genes and seven collagen types were differentially over expressed in deep Duroc wounds including 1a1, 1a2, 3a1, 4a1, 4a2, 5a1, 5a2, 5a3, 6a3 (transcript variant 5), 14a1 and 15a1. COL7a1 gene was differentially under expressed in deep Duroc wounds. The results suggest that collagens I, III, IV, V, VI, VII, XIV, and XV [corrected] are involved in the process of fibroproliferative scarring. With these clues, we will attempt to construct the regulatory pathway(s) of fibroproliferative healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18695616      PMCID: PMC2853751          DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181848141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  47 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 2.  Fibroproliferative scars.

Authors:  Shahrad R Rahban; Warren L Garner
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  Use of nude (athymic) mice for the study of hypertrophic scars and keloids: vascular continuity between mouse and implants.

Authors:  C W Kischer; D Sheridan; J Pindur
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1989-11

4.  An in vivo model of human proliferative scar.

Authors:  M Polo; Y J Kim; A Kucukcelebi; P G Hayward; F Ko; M C Robson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  A new model for studying the development of human hypertrophic burn scar formation.

Authors:  E C Robb; J P Waymack; G D Warden; P Nathan; J W Alexander
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct

6.  Skin wound healing in the first generation (F1) offspring of Yorkshire and red Duroc pigs: evidence for genetic inheritance of wound phenotype.

Authors:  C L Gallant-Behm; H Tsao; C Reno; M E Olson; D A Hart
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 2.744

7.  Further similarities between cutaneous scarring in the female, red Duroc pig and human hypertrophic scarring.

Authors:  Kathy Q Zhu; Loren H Engrav; Richard N Tamura; Jana A Cole; Pornprom Muangman; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Control of hypertrophic scar growth using antibody-targeted photolysis.

Authors:  S F Wolfort; S R Reiken; F Berthiaume; R G Tompkins; M L Yarmush
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  The use of athymic nude mice for the study of human keloids.

Authors:  M R Shetlar; C L Shetlar; L Hendricks; C W Kischer
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1985-09

10.  Systemic and cell type-specific gene expression patterns in scleroderma skin.

Authors:  Michael L Whitfield; Deborah R Finlay; John Isaac Murray; Olga G Troyanskaya; Jen-Tsan Chi; Alexander Pergamenschikov; Timothy H McCalmont; Patrick O Brown; David Botstein; M Kari Connolly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

1.  A polarized multispectral imaging system for quantitative assessment of hypertrophic scars.

Authors:  Pejhman Ghassemi; Taryn E Travis; Lauren T Moffatt; Jeffrey W Shupp; Jessica C Ramella-Roman
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  ANEXdb: an integrated animal ANnotation and microarray EXpression database.

Authors:  Oliver Couture; Keith Callenberg; Neeraj Koul; Sushain Pandit; Remy Younes; Zhi-Liang Hu; Jack Dekkers; James Reecy; Vasant Honavar; Christopher Tuggle
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Changes in mitochondrial DNA alter expression of nuclear encoded genes associated with tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jana Jandova; Jaroslav Janda; James E Sligh
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 4.  Integrins in Wound Healing.

Authors:  Leeni Koivisto; Jyrki Heino; Lari Häkkinen; Hannu Larjava
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Therapeutic improvement of scarring: mechanisms of scarless and scar-forming healing and approaches to the discovery of new treatments.

Authors:  Nick L Occleston; Anthony D Metcalfe; Adam Boanas; Nicholas J Burgoyne; Kerry Nield; Sharon O'Kane; Mark W J Ferguson
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2010-08-03

6.  Biphasic presence of fibrocytes in a porcine hypertrophic scar model.

Authors:  Taryn E Travis; Matthew J Mino; Lauren T Moffatt; Neil A Mauskar; Nicholas J Prindeze; Pejhman Ghassemi; Jessica C Ramella-Roman; Marion H Jordan; Jeffrey W Shupp
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 7.  Current concepts related to hypertrophic scarring in burn injuries.

Authors:  Ryan S Chiang; Anna A Borovikova; Kassandra King; Derek A Banyard; Shadi Lalezari; Jason D Toranto; Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth; Gregory R D Evans; Alan D Widgerow
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Delayed topical p38 MAPK inhibition attenuates full-thickness burn wound inflammatory signaling.

Authors:  Damien Carter; Adelaide Warsen; Katherine Mandell; Joseph Cuschieri; Ronald V Maier; Saman Arbabi
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 9.  Keloids: Animal models and pathologic equivalents to study tissue fibrosis.

Authors:  Jaana Marttala; Jonathan P Andrews; Joel Rosenbloom; Jouni Uitto
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 11.583

10.  Functional genomics unique to week 20 post wounding in the deep cone/fat dome of the Duroc/Yorkshire porcine model of fibroproliferative scarring.

Authors:  Loren H Engrav; Christopher K Tuggle; Kathleen F Kerr; Kathy Q Zhu; Surawej Numhom; Oliver P Couture; Richard P Beyer; Anne M Hocking; Gretchen J Carrougher; Maria Luiza C Ramos; Matthew B Klein; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.