Literature DB >> 18695019

Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.

Rupal Patel1, Pamela Campellone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, the authors sought to understand acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in speakers with dysarthria (DYS) and healthy controls (HC).
METHOD: The production experiment examined the ability of 12 DYS (9 male, 3 female; M=39 years of age) and 12 age- and gender-matched HC (9 male, 3 female; M=37.5 years of age) to signal contrastive stress within short sentences. Acoustic changes in fundamental frequency (F0), intensity, and duration were studied. The perceptual experiment explored whether 48 unfamiliar listeners (24 male, 24 female; M=23.4 years of age) could identify the intended stress location in DYS and HC productions.
RESULTS: Although both speaker groups used all 3 prosodic cues, DYS relied more heavily on duration. Despite reduced F0 and intensity variation within DYS utterances, listeners were highly accurate at identifying both DYS (>93%) and HC (>97%) productions. Acoustic predictors of listener accuracy included heightened prosodic cues on stressed words along with marked decreases in these variables for neighboring nonstressed words.
CONCLUSIONS: Speakers signaled contrastive stress using relative changes in one or more prosodic cue. Although individual speakers employed different cue combinations, listeners were highly adept at discerning the intended stress location. The communicative potential of prosody in speakers with congenital dysarthria is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18695019     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0078)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  6 in total

1.  Prosodic adaptations to pitch perturbation in running speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Caroline Niziolek; Kevin Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The Impact of Contrastive Stress on Vowel Acoustics and Intelligibility in Dysarthria.

Authors:  Kathryn P Connaghan; Rupal Patel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Relationship Between Prosody and Intelligibility in Children with Dysarthria.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Katherine C Hustad; Kathryn P Connaghan; William Furr
Journal:  J Med Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-12

4.  Predicting Intelligibility Gains in Individuals With Dysarthria From Baseline Speech Features.

Authors:  Annalise R Fletcher; Megan J McAuliffe; Kaitlin L Lansford; Donal G Sinex; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Surface Electromyography-Based Recognition, Synthesis, and Perception of Prosodic Subvocal Speech.

Authors:  Jennifer M Vojtech; Michael D Chan; Bhawna Shiwani; Serge H Roy; James T Heaton; Geoffrey S Meltzner; Paola Contessa; Gianluca De Luca; Rupal Patel; Joshua C Kline
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Assessment of prosodic communicative efficiency in Parkinson's disease as judged by professional listeners.

Authors:  Heidi Martens; Gwen Van Nuffelen; Patrick Cras; Barbara Pickut; Miet De Letter; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2011-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.