Literature DB >> 18694878

Floral and inflorescence morphology and ontogeny in Beta vulgaris, with special emphasis on the ovary position.

Hilda Flores Olvera1, Erik Smets, Alexander Vrijdaghs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In spite of recent phylogenetic analyses for the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae complex, some morphological characters are not unambiguously interpreted, which raises homology questions. Therefore, ontogenetic investigations, emphasizing on 'bracteoles' in Atripliceae and flowers in Chenopodioideae, were conducted. This first paper presents original ontogenetic observations in Beta vulgaris, which was chosen as a reference species for further comparative investigation because of its unclarified phylogenetic position and its flowers with a (semi-)inferior ovary, whereas all other Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae have hypogynous flowers.
METHODS: Inflorescences and flowers were examined using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. KEY
RESULTS: Floral development starts from an inflorescence unit primordium subtended by a lateral bract. This primordium develops into a determinate axis on which two opposite lateral flowers originate, each subtended by a bracteole. On a flower primordium, first five tepal primordia appear, followed by five opposite stamen primordia. Simultaneously, a convex floral apex appears, which differentiates into an annular ovary primordium with three stigma primordia, surrounding a central, single ovule. A floral tube, which raises the outer floral whorls, envelops the ovary, resulting in a semi-inferior ovary at mature stage. Similarly, a stamen tube is formed, raising the insertion points of the stamens, and forming a staminal ring, which does not contain stomata. During floral development, the calyces of the terminal flower and of one of the lateral flowers often fuse, forming a compound fruit structure.
CONCLUSIONS: In Beta vulgaris, the inflorescence is compound, consisting of an indeterminate main axis with many elementary dichasia as inflorescence units, of which the terminal flower and one lateral flower fuse at a later stage. Floral parts develop starting from the outer whorl towards the gynoecium. Because of the formation of an epigynous hypanthium, the ovary becomes semi-inferior in the course of floral development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18694878      PMCID: PMC2701786          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  4 in total

1.  The floral scales in Hellmuthia (Cyperaceae, Cyperoideae) and Paramapania (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae): an ontogenetic study.

Authors:  A Vrijdaghs; P Goetghebeur; E Smets; A M Muasya
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences.

Authors:  Philippe Cuénoud; Vincent Savolainen; Lars W Chatrou; Martyn Powell; Renée J Grayer; Mark W Chase
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 3.  Origins of flower morphology.

Authors:  P K Endress
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2001-08-15

4.  Structural homology and developmental transformations associated with ovary diversification in Lithophragma (Saxifragaceae).

Authors:  R K Kuzoff; L Hufford; D E Soltis
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.844

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  The need to re-investigate the nature of homoplastic characters: an ontogenetic case study of the 'bracteoles' in Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae).

Authors:  Hilda Flores-Olvera; Alexander Vrijdaghs; Helga Ochoterena; Erik Smets
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Floral development of Hydrocera and Impatiens reveals evolutionary trends in the most early diverged lineages of the Balsaminaceae.

Authors:  Steven B Janssens; Erik F Smets; Alexander Vrijdaghs
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.