INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) frequently results in devastating and prolonged morbidity. Cellular therapy is a burgeoning field of experimental treatment that has shown promise in the management of many diseases, including TBI. Previous work suggests that certain stem and progenitor cell populations migrate to sites of inflammation and improve functional outcome in rodents after neural injury. Unfortunately, recent study has revealed potential limitations of acute and intravenous stem cell therapy. We studied subacute, direct intracerebral neural stem and progenitor cell (NSC) therapy for TBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NSCs were characterized by flow cytometry and placed (400,000 cells in 50 muL 1x phosphate-buffered saline) into and around the direct injury area, using stereotactic guidance, of female Sprague Dawley rats 1 wk after undergoing a controlled cortical impact injury. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify cells located in the brain at 48 h and 2 wk after administration. Motor function was assessed using the neurological severity score, foot fault, rotarod, and beam balance. Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze learning paradigm. Repeated measures analysis of variance with post-hoc analysis were used to determine significance at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that 1.4-1.9% of infused cells remained in the neural tissue at 48 h and 2 wk post placement. Nearly all cells were located along injection tracks at 48 h. At 2 wk some cell dispersion was apparent. Rotarod motor testing revealed significant increases in maximal speed among NSC-treated rats compared with saline controls at d 4 (36.4 versus 27.1 rpm, P < 0.05) and 5 (35.8 versus 28.9 rpm, P < 0.05). All other motor and cognitive evaluations were not significantly different compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of NSCs led to the cells incorporating and remaining in the tissues 2 wk after placement. Motor function tests revealed improvements in the ability to run on a rotating rod; however, other motor and cognitive functions were not significantly improved by NSC therapy. Further examination of a dose response and optimization of placement strategy may improve long-term cell survival and maximize functional recovery.
INTRODUCTION:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) frequently results in devastating and prolonged morbidity. Cellular therapy is a burgeoning field of experimental treatment that has shown promise in the management of many diseases, including TBI. Previous work suggests that certain stem and progenitor cell populations migrate to sites of inflammation and improve functional outcome in rodents after neural injury. Unfortunately, recent study has revealed potential limitations of acute and intravenous stem cell therapy. We studied subacute, direct intracerebral neural stem and progenitor cell (NSC) therapy for TBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NSCs were characterized by flow cytometry and placed (400,000 cells in 50 muL 1x phosphate-buffered saline) into and around the direct injury area, using stereotactic guidance, of female Sprague Dawley rats 1 wk after undergoing a controlled cortical impact injury. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify cells located in the brain at 48 h and 2 wk after administration. Motor function was assessed using the neurological severity score, foot fault, rotarod, and beam balance. Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze learning paradigm. Repeated measures analysis of variance with post-hoc analysis were used to determine significance at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that 1.4-1.9% of infused cells remained in the neural tissue at 48 h and 2 wk post placement. Nearly all cells were located along injection tracks at 48 h. At 2 wk some cell dispersion was apparent. Rotarod motor testing revealed significant increases in maximal speed among NSC-treated rats compared with saline controls at d 4 (36.4 versus 27.1 rpm, P < 0.05) and 5 (35.8 versus 28.9 rpm, P < 0.05). All other motor and cognitive evaluations were not significantly different compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of NSCs led to the cells incorporating and remaining in the tissues 2 wk after placement. Motor function tests revealed improvements in the ability to run on a rotating rod; however, other motor and cognitive functions were not significantly improved by NSC therapy. Further examination of a dose response and optimization of placement strategy may improve long-term cell survival and maximize functional recovery.
Authors: Maria Cristina Morganti-Kossmann; Mario Rancan; Philip F Stahel; Thomas Kossmann Journal: Curr Opin Crit Care Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.687
Authors: Peter Riess; Chen Zhang; Kathryn E Saatman; Helmut L Laurer; Luca G Longhi; Ramesh Raghupathi; Philipp M Lenzlinger; Jonathan Lifshitz; John Boockvar; Edmund Neugebauer; Evan Y Snyder; Tracy K McIntosh Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Matthew C Tate; Deborah A Shear; Stuart W Hoffman; Donald G Stein; David R Archer; Michelle C LaPlaca Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2002 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: S Kelly; T M Bliss; A K Shah; G H Sun; M Ma; W C Foo; J Masel; M A Yenari; I L Weissman; N Uchida; T Palmer; G K Steinberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hung Nguyen; Sydney Zarriello; Alexandreya Coats; Cannon Nelson; Chase Kingsbury; Anna Gorsky; Mira Rajani; Elliot G Neal; Cesar V Borlongan Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Peter A Walker; Fernando Jimenez; Michael H Gerber; Kevin R Aroom; Shinil K Shah; Matthew T Harting; Brijesh S Gill; Sean I Savitz; Charles S Cox Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Shinil K Shah; Kevin R Aroom; Peter A Walker; Hasen Xue; Fernando Jimenez; Brijesh S Gill; Charles S Cox; Stacey D Moore-Olufemi Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: L Christine Turtzo; Matthew D Budde; Eric M Gold; Bobbi K Lewis; Lindsay Janes; Angela Yarnell; Neil E Grunberg; William Watson; Joseph A Frank Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Peter A Walker; Matthew T Harting; Fernando Jimenez; Shinil K Shah; Shibani Pati; Pramod K Dash; Charles S Cox Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.272