Literature DB >> 1869454

Prospective randomized trial comparing hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in stages III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma.

L H Pinto1, P C Canary, C M Araújo, S C Bacelar, L Souhami.   

Abstract

From April 1986 to May 1989, 112 patients seen at a single institution with previously untreated squamous cell oropharynx carcinoma, Stages III and IV, were randomly assigned to 66 Gy in 33 fractions of 2 Gy each (conventional RT) versus 70.4 Gy in 64 fractions of 1.1 Gy given twice a day with a minimal interfraction interval of 6 hours (hyperfractionated RT). The overall time for both arms was 6 1/2 weeks. Patients were stratified by site (base of the tongue vs others), T stage (T1/T2 vs T3 vs T4), N stage (N0/N1 vs N2 vs N3), and lymphnode size (less than 6 cm vs greater than 6 cm). As of January 1990, an analysis was performed in 98 patients (8 patients in the conventional arm and 6 in the hyperfractionation not included). The groups were balanced by age, performance status, stage, and site of the primary disease. The median follow-up time was 25 months. The probability of complete loco-regional response was 62% in the hyperfractionation arm and 52% for the conventional fractionation (p = 0.28). There was no difference in the control of lymphnodal disease (hyperfractionated = 55%, conventional = 57%; p = 0.92), but the disease control in the oropharynx only was significantly improved in the hyperfractionation arm (84% vs 64%, p = 0.02). Overall survival rate at 42 months was 27% for the hyperfractionation arm and 8% for the conventional (p = 0.03). Survival rates for hyperfractionated versus conventional RT were 40% versus 18% (p = 0.06), respectively, for Stage III patients and 16% versus 0% (p = 0.15), respectively, for Stage IV. There was significant improvement in survival in favor of the hyperfractionation arm in patients with lesions outside the base of the tongue (31% vs 15%, p = 0.02), for those with a 50-70% Karnofsky status (19% vs 0%, p = 0.006) and for patients with N0/N1 disease (38% vs 15%, p = 0.03). Acute toxicities were of similar magnitude, although both skin and mucosal reactions appeared earlier on the hyperfractionation scheme. To date, no differences in late toxicity have been observed. We conclude that in a subset group of patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the oropharynx, hyperfractionated radiotherapy appears to provide improved survival without adding to increased toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1869454     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90670-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

Review 1.  Altered fractionation in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  K S Hu; L B Harrison
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Monte Carlo radiotherapy simulations of accelerated repopulation and reoxygenation for hypoxic head and neck cancer.

Authors:  W M Harriss-Phillips; E Bezak; E K Yeoh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Altered and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in locoregional control and survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx.

Authors:  Valentina Krstevska; Simonida Crvenkova
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 4.  Advances in the treatment of locally advanced non-nasopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region.

Authors:  Amanda Psyrri; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  [A phase-I/II study on the local hyperthermia of cervical N2/N3 lymph node metastases].

Authors:  H Stahl; P Wust; R Graf; J Löffel; J Bier; H Riess; V Jahnke; R Felix
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and simultaneous cisplatin for stage-III and -IV carcinomas of the head and neck. Long-term results including functional outcome.

Authors:  P Huguenin; C Glanzmann; D Taussky; U M Lütolf; S Schmid; K Moe
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Clinical radiobiology of head and neck cancer: the hypothesis of stem cell activation.

Authors:  P Pedicini; R Caivano; A Fiorentino; L Strigari
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  A phase I clinical trial of prolonged infusion of hydroxyurea in combination with hyperfractionated, accelerated, external radiation therapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  J J Beitler; R V Smith; H Haynes; C E Silver; A Quish; T Kotz; M Serrano; A Brook; S Wadler
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Altered fractionation outcomes for hypoxic head and neck cancer using the HYP-RT Monte Carlo model.

Authors:  W M Harriss-Phillips; E Bezak; E K Yeoh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A nationwide study of the epidemiology, treatment and survival of oropharyngeal carcinoma in The Netherlands.

Authors:  S Mak-Kregar; F J Hilgers; P C Levendag; J J Manni; H Lubsen; J L Roodenburg; J M van der Beek; A G van der Meij
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.