Literature DB >> 18693662

[Combined general-epidural anesthesia compared to general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality and analgesic efficacy in thoracoabdominal surgery].

J M Seller Losada1, C Sifre Julio, V Ruiz García.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to compare combined general-epidural anesthesia, followed by postoperative epidural analgesia, and general anesthesia followed by postoperative parenteral analgesia without epidural analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal surgery. Outcome measures considered were mortality, length of stay in hospital and in the intensive care unit, analgesia, and morbidity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry and the metaRegister of clinical trials at http://www.controlled-trials.com/mrct/ mrct info es.asp). We also hand-searched the literature. Authors were contacted when deemed necessary.
RESULTS: A total of 30 trials (4294 patients) were analyzed. Combined anesthesia showed significant advantages in relation to 2 variables: respiratory failure (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.87) and analgesia on the first day after surgery (weighted mean difference, -6.91 95% CI, -9.46 to -4.36). No significant differences were found in the other variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined anesthesia provides better analgesia and is associated with fewer cases of postoperative respiratory failure. No significant differences were found in mortality, length of stay in hospital, or other morbidity variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18693662     DOI: 10.1016/s0034-9356(08)70592-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim        ISSN: 0034-9356


  2 in total

1.  Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jieping Yang; Xukeng Guo; Zonggui Zheng; Weiqi Ke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.376

2.  Intravenous fluid restriction after major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Hester Vermeulen; Jan Hofland; Dink A Legemate; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.