Literature DB >> 18693261

Evolution of Xmrk: an oncogene, but also a speciation gene?

Manfred Schartl1.   

Abstract

Genes that exert their function when they are introduced into a foreign genetic background pose many questions to our current understanding of the forces and mechanisms that promote either the maintenance or divergence of gene functions over evolutionary time. The melanoma inducing Xmrk oncogene of the Southern platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus) is a stable constituent of the genome of this species. It displays its tumorigenic function, however, almost exclusively only after inter-populational or, even more severely, interspecific hybridization events. The Xiphophorus hybrid melanoma system has gained attention in biomedical research as a genetic model for studying tumor formation. From an evolutionary perspective, a prominent question is: how could this gene persist over millions of years? An attractive hypothesis is that Xmrk, acting as a detrimental gene in a hybrid genome, could be a speciation gene that shields the gene pool of its species from mixing with other closely related sympatric species. In this article, I briefly review our current knowledge of the molecular genetics and biochemical functions of the Xmrk gene and discuss aspects of its evolutionary history and presence with respect to this idea. While Xmrk as a potentially injurious oncogene has clearly survived for millions of years, its role as a speciation gene has to be questioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18693261     DOI: 10.1002/bies.20807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  17 in total

1.  Selection for a dominant oncogene and large male size as a risk factor for melanoma in the Xiphophorus animal model.

Authors:  André A Fernandez; Paul R Bowser
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  The B in 'BDM.' William Bateson did not advocate a genic speciation theory.

Authors:  D R Forsdyke
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  A new model army: Emerging fish models to study the genomics of vertebrate Evo-Devo.

Authors:  Ingo Braasch; Samuel M Peterson; Thomas Desvignes; Braedan M McCluskey; Peter Batzel; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.656

4.  Natural hybridization reveals incompatible alleles that cause melanoma in swordtail fish.

Authors:  Daniel L Powell; Mateo García-Olazábal; Mackenzie Keegan; Patrick Reilly; Kang Du; Alejandra P Díaz-Loyo; Shreya Banerjee; Danielle Blakkan; David Reich; Peter Andolfatto; Gil G Rosenthal; Manfred Schartl; Molly Schumer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Gene amplification and functional diversification of melanocortin 4 receptor at an extremely polymorphic locus controlling sexual maturation in the platyfish.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Volff; Yvonne Selz; Carsten Hoffmann; Alexander Froschauer; Christina Schultheis; Cornelia Schmidt; Qingchun Zhou; Wolfgang Bernhardt; Reinhold Hanel; Astrid Böhne; Frédéric Brunet; Béatrice Ségurens; Arnaud Couloux; Sylvie Bernard-Samain; Valérie Barbe; Catherine Ozouf-Costaz; Delphine Galiana; Martin J Lohse; Manfred Schartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Walls around tumours - why plants do not develop cancer.

Authors:  John H Doonan; Robert Sablowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Genetic and environmental melanoma models in fish.

Authors:  E Elizabeth Patton; David L Mitchell; Rodney S Nairn
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 4.693

8.  WD-repeat instability and diversification of the Podospora anserina hnwd non-self recognition gene family.

Authors:  Damien Chevanne; Sven J Saupe; Corinne Clavé; Mathieu Paoletti
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Multiple molecular mechanisms cause reproductive isolation between three yeast species.

Authors:  Jui-Yu Chou; Yin-Shan Hung; Kuan-Huei Lin; Hsin-Yi Lee; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Sex-specific incompatibility generates locus-specific rates of introgression between species.

Authors:  Diana Fusco; Marcy K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.