Literature DB >> 18693211

Low-dose filgrastim in patients with breast cancer treated with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide.

Eric J Ip1, Annette Lee-Ma, Lawrence S Troxell, James Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare low-dose filgrastim (150 microg/day subcutaneously) with standard-dose subcutaneous filgrastim (300 microg/day) or lenograstim (263 microg/day) in preventing febrile neutropenia and hospitalizations in breast cancer patients receiving the docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective data analysis was performed involving 22 adult women with breast cancer who concurrently received the docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy regimen and low-dose filgrastim from March 2004 to February 2007. Data from this study were compared to previously published data in which patients received standard-dose filgrastim or lenograstim.
RESULTS: More patients developed febrile neutropenia in the low-dose filgrastim group compared with the standard-dose group (32% versus 7.5%, respectively; p = 0.0014; relative risk [RR] = 4.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-7.83). More patients were hospitalized due to febrile neutropenia in the low-dose filgrastim group compared with the standard-dose group (32% versus 6.5%, respectively; p < 0.001; RR = 4.89; 95% CI, 2.32-9.13). More chemotherapy cycles resulted in febrile neutropenia in the low-dose filgrastim group compared with the standard-dose group (6.7% versus 1.2%, respectively; p < 0.001; RR = 5.58; 95% CI, 2.49-12.27).
CONCLUSION: In patients with breast cancer treated with the docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen, low-dose filgrastim was associated with a higher frequency of febrile neutropenia, hospitalization due to febrile neutropenia, and cycles with febrile neutropenia compared with a historical control group treated with standard-dose filgrastim or lenograstim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18693211     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp070489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  4 in total

Review 1.  A way forward on the medically appropriate use of white cell growth factors.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Jeffrey Crawford; Didier Kamioner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Impact of recommended weight-based dosing of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors in acute leukemia and stem cell transplant patients.

Authors:  Jennifer K Hockings; Diwura K Owolabi; Joyce E Broyles; Susan C Wheelis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Nano-Based Approved Pharmaceuticals for Cancer Treatment: Present and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Francisco Rodríguez; Pablo Caruana; Noa De la Fuente; Pía Español; María Gámez; Josep Balart; Elisa Llurba; Ramón Rovira; Raúl Ruiz; Cristina Martín-Lorente; José Luis Corchero; María Virtudes Céspedes
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.