INTRODUCTION: Although multi-item health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments provide prognostic information, they are rarely used in routine clinical practice. AIM: To examine whether a single question about global perceived health (GPH) was a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular (CV) mortality over 10 years of follow-up in elderly patients with possible heart failure (HF) in primary care. METHOD: GPH was measured using the first question on the Short-Form-36 concerning current health status. Of the 510 patients who underwent baseline evaluation, 448 patients were included. RESULTS: Cox proportional regression hazard analysis controlled for age, sex, NYHA class, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction and B-type natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations, showed that patients with GPH rated as "poor" or "good" were at four (HR 4.1 CI 95% 1.8-9.4) and three times (HR 3.4 CI 95% 1.4-7.8) the risk of CV mortality, respectively. CONCLUSION: GPH is an independent predictor of CV mortality in elderly patients with possible HF. As a complement to clinical factors when evaluating severity of HF, GPH could be an important tool for identifying patients at risk of adverse CV events and in need of improved treatment.
INTRODUCTION: Although multi-item health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments provide prognostic information, they are rarely used in routine clinical practice. AIM: To examine whether a single question about global perceived health (GPH) was a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular (CV) mortality over 10 years of follow-up in elderly patients with possible heart failure (HF) in primary care. METHOD:GPH was measured using the first question on the Short-Form-36 concerning current health status. Of the 510 patients who underwent baseline evaluation, 448 patients were included. RESULTS: Cox proportional regression hazard analysis controlled for age, sex, NYHA class, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction and B-type natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations, showed that patients with GPH rated as "poor" or "good" were at four (HR 4.1 CI 95% 1.8-9.4) and three times (HR 3.4 CI 95% 1.4-7.8) the risk of CV mortality, respectively. CONCLUSION:GPH is an independent predictor of CV mortality in elderly patients with possible HF. As a complement to clinical factors when evaluating severity of HF, GPH could be an important tool for identifying patients at risk of adverse CV events and in need of improved treatment.
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Stephen T Moelter; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Susan J Pressler; Sabina De Geest; Sheryl Potashnik; Desiree Fleck; Daohang Sha; Steven L Sayers; William S Weintraub; Terri E Weaver; Lee R Goldberg Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Ruth Masterson Creber; Victoria M Pak; Miranda Varrasse; David F Dinges; Joyce Wald; Barbara Riegel Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Alanna M Chamberlain; Sheila M McNallan; Shannon M Dunlay; John A Spertus; Margaret M Redfield; Debra K Moser; Robert L Kane; Susan A Weston; Véronique L Roger Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: E Lehmkuhl; F Kendel; G Gelbrich; A Dunkel; S Oertelt-Prigione; B Babitsch; C Knosalla; N Bairey-Merz; R Hetzer; V Regitz-Zagrosek Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-04-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Dale Glaser; Kathy Richards; Steven L Sayers; Amy Marzolf; William S Weintraub; Lee R Goldberg Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Tayler A Buchan; Crizza Ching; Farid Foroutan; Abdullah Malik; Julian F Daza; Nicholas Ng Fat Hing; Reed Siemieniuk; Nathan Evaniew; Ani Orchanian-Cheff; Heather J Ross; Gordon Guyatt; Ana C Alba Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 4.214