Literature DB >> 18692827

Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial.

William B Schoolcraft1, Mandy G Katz-Jaffe, John Stevens, Mary Rawlins, Santiago Munne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential benefit of preimplantation aneuploidy testing on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women of advanced maternal age (AMA).
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Private IVF clinic. PATIENT(S): Sixty-two infertile AMA couples undergoing fertility treatment. INTERVENTION(S): Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, and 22. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Preimplantation aneuploidy testing of biopsied blastomeres on day 3 of development. RESULT(S): Fertilization and blastocyst developmental rates were similar for the test and control groups: 80% versus 77.4% and 49% versus 48.2%, respectively. The average number of embryos transferred was comparable at 2.2 for the test group and 2.7 for the control group. Implantation rates were also equivalent across the two groups: 37.3% in the control group versus 36.5% in the test group. Nevertheless, the spontaneous abortion rate was observed to be lower for the test group: 25.9% versus 32.26% in the control group. This resulted in an observed increase in delivery rates for the test group: 78% versus 67.74% in the control group. CONCLUSION(S): Preimplantation aneuploidy testing does not appear to statistically significantly improve outcome parameters in infertile AMA patients; however, a trend toward a decrease in the spontaneous abortion rate with a subsequent higher delivery rate was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18692827     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  42 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Johnny Juhl Hindkjaer; Marie Louise Grøndahl; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages.

Authors:  Martin D Keltz; Mario Vega; Ido Sirota; Matthew Lederman; Erin L Moshier; Eric Gonzales; Daniel Stein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Comment on Checa MA et al. J Assist Reprod Genet DOI 10.1007/s10815-009-9328-4.

Authors:  Ernest H Y Ng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ivan Solà; Ana Robles; Ramón Carreras; Juan Balasch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Analysis of pronuclear zygote configurations in 459 clinical pregnancies obtained with assisted reproductive technique procedures.

Authors:  Alessia Nicoli; Francesco Capodanno; Lucia Moscato; Ilaria Rondini; Maria T Villani; Antonella Tuzio; Giovanni B La Sala
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Karen Sermon; Catherine Staessen; Inge Liebaers; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Thomas D'Hooghe; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; John Collins; Luca Gianaroli; Veerle Goossens; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Markus Montag; Sjoerd Repping; Andreas Schmutzler
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.