Literature DB >> 18692651

Anatomic aspects of the atrioventricular junction influencing radiofrequency Cox maze IV procedures.

Manuel Castellá1, Antonio García-Valentín, Daniel Pereda, Andrea Colli, Antonio Martinez, Daniel Martinez, José Ramirez, Jaime Mulet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes the anatomic structure of the mitral and tricuspid annuli, their relationship with the coronary arteries and veins, and how this anatomic distribution may affect atrial ablation with bipolar radiofrequency clamps, the only technology that ensures transmurality.
METHODS: Nine explanted fresh human hearts were studied, two of them with left coronary dominance. Two types of bipolar radiofrequency clamps were positioned to reach the mitral and tricuspid annuli, and relationships within the atrioventricular junction were analyzed, including coronary sinus and coronary arteries.
RESULTS: In all hearts studied, the coronary arteries and veins within the adipose tissue of the right or left atrioventricular groove lay in the atrial side, 3 to 18 mm away from the mitral or tricuspid annuli. When the bipolar radiofrequency clamp was closed toward the mitral annulus, the coronary sinus was always included between the jaws, and in left coronary-dominant hearts, the circumflex artery was also included. Nevertheless, the clamp never reached the annulus owing to the increase in thickness of the adipose tissue around the groove and the ventricular mass, leaving 5 to 10 mm of atrial myocardium free from the radiofrequency electrodes. In the right atrium, clamp placement toward the tricuspid annulus excluding the right coronary left 8 to 18 mm of atrial muscle free from the bipolar electrodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar radiofrequency clamps are not sufficient to complete a Cox maze IV procedure. Moreover, they may compromise coronary arteries in patients with left coronary dominance. Lines to the atrioventricular annuli need to be completed with the cut-and-sew technique or with alternative monopolar energy devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18692651     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.03.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Treatment Complications of Atrial Fibrillation and Their Management.

Authors:  Allan Mattia; Joshua Newman; Frank Manetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-03-05

2.  Transmitral approach to monopolar radiofrequency ablation of inferior papillary muscle for refractory ischemic ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Antonino S Rubino; Francesco Onorati; Giuseppe F Serraino; Attilio Renzulli
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

3.  Assessment of concomitant paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation in mitral valve surgery patients based on continuous monitoring: does a different lesion set matter?

Authors:  Alexandr Bogachev-Prokophiev; Sergey Zheleznev; Alexey Pivkin; Evgeny Pokushalov; Alexander Romanov; Vladimir Nazarov; Alexander Karaskov
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-19

4.  Two-staged hybrid treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: short-term single-centre results.

Authors:  Vojtěch Kurfirst; Aleš Mokraček; Alan Bulava; Júlia Čanadyova; Jiři Haniš; Ladislav Pešl
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-12

5.  The problem with concomitant atrial fibrillation in non-mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Mark La Meir; Sandro Gelsomino; Bart Nonneman
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01

6.  Comparison of two radiofrequency ablation devices for atrial fibrillation concomitant with a rheumatic valve procedure.

Authors:  Qin Jiang; Sheng-Zhong Liu; Lu Jiang; Ke-Li Huang; Jing Guo; Sheng-Shou Hu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.