Literature DB >> 18692266

Treatment planning comparison between conformal radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in the case of locally advanced-stage NSCLC.

Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo1, Italo Dell'oca, Sara Broggi, Claudio Fiorino, Lucia Perna, Marcella Pasetti, Giulia Sangalli, Nadia di Muzio, Ferruccio Fazio, Riccardo Calandrino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of Helical Tomotherapy (HT) upon the dose distribution when compared to our routinely delivered 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) in the case of patients affected by stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen stage III inoperable NSCLC patients were scheduled to receive 61.2-70.2Gy, 1.8Gy/fraction. Two treatment techniques (HT and CRT) were considered, and in the case of CRT the dose calculation was performed using both the pencil beam (PB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) available on the Varian Eclipse planning system. Dose volume constraints for PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed for the HT inverse planning with the highest priority upon PTV coverage and spinal cord sparing. The three plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). A statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric Wilcoxon matched pairs tests.
RESULTS: In CRT the use of a less accurate algorithm (PB) decreased the monitor unit number by 2.4%. HT significantly improved dose homogeneity within PTV compared with CRT_AAA. For lung parenchyma V20-V40 were lower with HT, corresponding to a decrease of 7% in the risk of radiation pneumonitis. The volume of the heart and esophagus irradiated to >45-60Gy were reduced using HT plans. For eight PTs with an esophagus-PTV overlap >5%, HT significantly reduced both late and acute esophageal complication probability.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings obtained in stage III NSCLC patients underline that HT guarantees an important sparing of lungs and esophagus, thus HT has the potential to improve therapeutic ratio, when compared with CRT, by means of dose escalation and/or combined treatment strategy. In CRT of locally advanced lung cancers, the use of a more advanced algorithm would give significantly better modeling of target dose and coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18692266     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  24 in total

1.  Helical tomotherapy for radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer: a preferred plan?

Authors:  Gary Y Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  The radiation techniques of tomotherapy & intensity-modulated radiation therapy applied to lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhengfei Zhu; Xiaolong Fu
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06

3.  Superior sulcus non-small cell lung carcinoma: A comparison of IMRT and 3D-RT dosimetry.

Authors:  Pierre Truntzer; Delphine Antoni; Nicola Santelmo; Catherine Schumacher; Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz; Elisabeth Quoix; Gilbert Massard; Georges Noël
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-05-05

4.  PET-guided dose escalation tomotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Andrei Fodor; Claudio Fiorino; Italo Dell'Oca; Sara Broggi; Marcella Pasetti; Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo; Luigi Gianolli; Riccardo Calandrino; Nadia Gisella Di Muzio
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Superiority of conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy over helical tomotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A comparative plan analysis.

Authors:  C Song; H Pyo; J Kim; Y K Lim; W C Kim; H J Kim; D W Kim; K H Cho
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Improved oncologic outcomes with image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy using helical tomotherapy in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong In Yoon; Ik Jae Lee; Kwang-Hyub Han; Jinsil Seong
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Advanced radiation techniques for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy.

Authors:  Nikhil Yegya-Raman; Wei Zou; Ke Nie; Jyoti Malhotra; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Evaluation of the target dose coverage of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer using helical tomotherapy: A dynamic phantom study.

Authors:  Masahide Saito; Hidekazu Suzuki; Naoki Sano; Kazunari Ashizawa; Kazuya Yoshizawa; Yuki Shibata; Koji Ueda; Takafumi Komiyama; Kan Marino; Shinichi Aoki; Ryo Saito; Yoshiyasu Maehata; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-01-14

9.  Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Adaptive Planning for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Richard Y Wu; Amy Y Liu; Terence T Sio; Pierre Blanchard; Cody Wages; Mayankkumar V Amin; Gary B Gunn; Uwe Titt; Rong Ye; Kazumichi Suzuki; Michael T Gillin; Xiaorong R Zhu; Radhe Mohan; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2017-12-28

10.  Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and conventional Linac-based X-knife stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary lung cancer or pulmonary metastases.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Li; Ju Yang; Juan Liu; Shanbao Gao; Baorui Liu; Jing Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.