Literature DB >> 18690901

Evaluating clinical accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring devices: other methods.

Iris M E Wentholt1, August A Hart, Joost B L Hoekstra, J Hans DeVries.   

Abstract

With more and more continuous glucose monitoring devices entering the market, the importance of adequate accuracy assessment grows. This review discusses pros and cons of Regression Analysis and Correlation Coefficient, Relative Difference measures, Bland Altman plot, ISO criteria, combined curve fitting, and epidemiological analyses, the latter including sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for hypoglycaemia. Finally, recommendations for much needed head-to-head studies are given. This paper is a revised and adapted version of How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors?, Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2007, in press, published with permission of the editor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690901     DOI: 10.2174/157339908785294424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev        ISSN: 1573-3998


  2 in total

1.  Measurement delay associated with the Guardian RT continuous glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  C Wei; D J Lunn; C L Acerini; J M Allen; A M Larsen; M E Wilinska; D B Dunger; R Hovorka
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.359

2.  The association of diabetes and anti-diabetic medications with clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  W Wu; K Merriman; A Nabaah; N Seval; D Seval; H Lin; M Wang; M H Qazilbash; V Baladandayuthapani; D Berry; R Z Orlowski; M-H Lee; S-C J Yeung
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.