Literature DB >> 18690897

Implantable continuous glucose sensors.

Eric Renard1.   

Abstract

Because of the limits of wearable needle-type or microdialysis-based enzymatic sensors in clinical use, fully implantable glucose monitoring systems (IGMS) represent a promising alternative. Long-term use reducing impact of invasiveness due to implantation, less frequent calibration needs because of a more stable tissue environment around the sensor and potential easier inclusion in a closed-loop insulin delivery system are the expected benefits of IGMS. First experiences with subcutaneous and intravenous IGMS have been recently collected in pilot studies. While no severe adverse events have been reported, biointerface issues have been responsible for the failures of IGMS. Tissue reactions around implanted subcutaneous devices and damages of intravenous sensors due to shearing forces of blood flow impaired IGMS function and longevity. In functioning systems, accuracy of glucose measurement reached satisfactory levels for average durations of about 120 days with subcutaneous IGMS and 259 days with intravenous sensors. Moreover, sensor information could help to improve time spent in normal glucose range when provided to patients wearing subcutaneous IGMS and allowed safe and effective closed-loop glucose control when intravenous sensors were connected to implanted pumps using intra-peritoneal insulin delivery. These data could open a favourable perspective for IGMS after improvement of biointerface conditions and if compatible with an affordable cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690897     DOI: 10.2174/157339908785294406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev        ISSN: 1573-3998


  7 in total

Review 1.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Sampling interstitial fluid from human skin using a microneedle patch.

Authors:  Pradnya P Samant; Megan M Niedzwiecki; Nicholas Raviele; Vilinh Tran; Juan Mena-Lapaix; Douglas I Walker; Eric I Felner; Dean P Jones; Gary W Miller; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Wearable and implantable pancreas substitutes.

Authors:  Leonardo Ricotti; Tareq Assaf; Paolo Dario; Arianna Menciassi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Real-time measurement of small molecules directly in awake, ambulatory animals.

Authors:  Netzahualcóyotl Arroyo-Currás; Jacob Somerson; Philip A Vieira; Kyle L Ploense; Tod E Kippin; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A critical review of glucose biosensors based on carbon nanomaterials: carbon nanotubes and graphene.

Authors:  Zhigang Zhu; Luis Garcia-Gancedo; Andrew J Flewitt; Huaqing Xie; Francis Moussy; William I Milne
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in diabetes: patient populations, safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  Paolo Pozzilli; Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Roman Hovorka; Przemyslawa Jarosz-Chobot; Eric Renard
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 7.  Biosensors in clinical chemistry: An overview.

Authors:  Sathish Babu Murugaiyan; Ramesh Ramasamy; Niranjan Gopal; V Kuzhandaivelu
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-01-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.