Literature DB >> 18690786

Surveillance of healthcare-acquired infections in Queensland, Australia: data and lessons from the first 5 years.

Anthony P Morton1, Archie C A Clements, Shane R Doidge, Jenny Stackelroth, Merrilyn Curtis, Michael Whitby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present healthcare-acquired infection surveillance data for 2001-2005 in Queensland, Australia.
DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Twenty-three public hospitals in Queensland.
METHODS: We used computer-assisted surveillance to identify episodes of surgical site infection (SSI) in surgical patients. The risk-adjusted incidence of SSI was calculated by means of a risk-adjustment score modified from that of the US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, and the incidence of inpatient bloodstream infection (BSI) was adjusted for risk on the basis of hospital level (level 1, tertiary referral center; level 2, large general hospital; level 3, small general hospital). Funnel and Bayesian shrinkage plots were used for between-hospital comparisons. PATIENTS: A total of 49,804 surgical patients and 4,663 patients who experienced healthcare-associated BSI.
RESULTS: The overall cumulative incidence of in-hospital SSI ranged from 0.28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-1.54%) for radical mastectomies to 6.15% (95% CI, 3.22%-10.50%) for femoropopliteal bypass procedures. The incidence of inpatient BSI was 0.80, 0.28, and 0.22 episodes per 1,000 occupied bed-days in level 1, 2, and 3 hospitals, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated microorganism for SSI and BSI. Funnel and shrinkage plots showed at least 1 hospital with a signal indicating a possible higher-than-expected rate of S. aureus-associated BSI.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons between hospitals should be viewed with caution because of imperfect risk adjustment. It is our view that the data should be used to improve healthcare-acquired infection control practices using evidence-based systems rather than to judge institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690786     DOI: 10.1086/589904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  5 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of a central venous catheter care bundle.

Authors:  Kate A Halton; David Cook; David L Paterson; Nasia Safdar; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The increased risks of death and extra lengths of hospital and ICU stay from hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a case-control study.

Authors:  Adrian G Barnett; Katie Page; Megan Campbell; Elizabeth Martin; Rebecca Rashleigh-Rolls; Kate Halton; David L Paterson; Lisa Hall; Nerina Jimmieson; Katherine White; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Improved hospital-level risk adjustment for surveillance of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  E N C Tong; A C A Clements; M A Haynes; M A Jones; A P Morton; M Whitby
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Cost effectiveness of antimicrobial catheters in the intensive care unit: addressing uncertainty in the decision.

Authors:  Kate A Halton; David A Cook; Michael Whitby; David L Paterson; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft procedures: 10 years of surveillance data.

Authors:  Damin Si; Mohana Rajmokan; Prabha Lakhan; John Marquess; Christopher Coulter; David Paterson
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.