R Buchert1, F Thiele. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrase 52, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: The SRTM (simplified reference tissue model) of brain receptor imaging assumes that the time activity curve in the receptor-rich region of interest can be fitted satisfactorily by the 1-tissue compartment model. This assumption has been formulated by a rather restrictive constraint on the rate constants. Empirically, the SRTM might well describe also tracers which do not fulfil this constraint, such as [(11)C]raclopride, for example. However, this has not been justified rigorously. METHODS: The requirements for the SRTM to be applicable are analyzed in detail. RESULTS: The SRTM is applicable under a less restrictive constraint than described previously. The interpretation of the SRTM parameters R(1) and k(2) in physiological terms depends on the constraint, while the interpretation of BP(ND) does not. CONCLUSION: Correct interpretation of the results of the SRTM is tracer specific. In particular, the parameter R(1), which in case of compliance with the original constraint might be used to detect perfusion and/or extraction effects, might not be appropriate for this purpose in case of raclopride-like tracers.
AIM: The SRTM (simplified reference tissue model) of brain receptor imaging assumes that the time activity curve in the receptor-rich region of interest can be fitted satisfactorily by the 1-tissue compartment model. This assumption has been formulated by a rather restrictive constraint on the rate constants. Empirically, the SRTM might well describe also tracers which do not fulfil this constraint, such as [(11)C]raclopride, for example. However, this has not been justified rigorously. METHODS: The requirements for the SRTM to be applicable are analyzed in detail. RESULTS: The SRTM is applicable under a less restrictive constraint than described previously. The interpretation of the SRTM parameters R(1) and k(2) in physiological terms depends on the constraint, while the interpretation of BP(ND) does not. CONCLUSION: Correct interpretation of the results of the SRTM is tracer specific. In particular, the parameter R(1), which in case of compliance with the original constraint might be used to detect perfusion and/or extraction effects, might not be appropriate for this purpose in case of raclopride-like tracers.
Authors: Ingo Vernaleken; Lisa Peters; Mardjan Raptis; Robert Lin; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Yun Zhou; Oliver Winz; Frank Rösch; Peter Bartenstein; Dean F Wong; Wolfgang M Schäfer; Gerhard Gründer Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Anniek K D Visser; Erik F J De Vries; Nisha K Ramakrishnan; Antoon T M Willemsen; Fokko J Bosker; Johan A den Boer; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Aren van Waarde Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.488