Literature DB >> 18690367

Intra-organizational communication in healthcare--considerations for standardization and ICT application.

H Pirnejad1, Z Niazkhani, M Berg, R Bal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Intra-organizational communication is mostly interpersonal. Synchronous interruptive communication is recognized as a primary source of inefficiency and error in healthcare, and there is much potential for information and communication technology (ICT) to improve such communication. As recently suggested, however, due to communication failures ICT can also compound medical errors. In this paper we analyze factors that restrict the role of ICT in improving interpersonal healthcare communication and suggest solutions.
METHODS: We critically analyzed the literature from a selection of diverse scientific disciplines. These were related to interpersonal communication, to the role and place of standardization and computerization in its improvement, and to reducing medical errors.
RESULTS: Four possible scenarios were defined on how ICT can serve healthcare communication. Two differing conceptual frameworks about communication in healthcare were discussed. Considering "information space" as a part of "communication space" allows the recognition and control of the source of the semantic gaps in conventional standardization and an enhancement of the role of ICT in improving intra-organizational communication. Moreover, cognitive, social, and organizational dimensions of complexity in interpersonal communication can be managed. Three approaches to control the variability in those dimensions and to promote the role of ICT in intra-organizational communication were discussed.
CONCLUSION: A multi-dimensional approach is required to promote the role of ICT in intra-organizational communication in healthcare. Parallel to conventional standardization, at least three dimensions need to be addressed: controlling the effect of the social context, developing standard information processing skills, and most importantly, controlling variations in care practices' performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  13 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the ADE scorecards as a decision support tool for adverse drug event analysis and medication safety management.

Authors:  Werner O Hackl; Elske Ammenwerth; Romaric Marcilly; Emmanuel Chazard; Michel Luyckx; Pascale Leurs; Regis Beuscart
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Describing the Clinical Communication Space through a Model of Common Ground: 'you don't know what you don't know'.

Authors:  Craig E Kuziemsky; Lara Varpio
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

3.  Contextual Barriers to Communication Between Physicians and Nurses About Appropriate Catheter Use.

Authors:  Milisa Manojlovich; Jessica M Ameling; Jane Forman; Samantha Judkins; Martha Quinn; Jennifer Meddings
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  A Novel Survey to Examine the Relationship between Health IT Adoption and Nurse-Physician Communication.

Authors:  A Jay Holmgren; Eric Pfeifer; Milisa Manojlovich; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Clinical communication in diagnostic imaging studies: mixed-method study of pre- and post-implementation of a hospital information system.

Authors:  H Pirnejad; Z Niazkhani; R Bal
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Electronic exchange of discharge summaries between hospital and municipal care from health personnel's perspectives.

Authors:  Line Melby; Ragnhild Hellesø
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Using Qualitative Methods to Explore Communication Practices in the Context of Patient Care Rounds on General Care Units.

Authors:  Milisa Manojlovich; Molly Harrod; Timothy P Hofer; Megan Lafferty; Michaella McBratnie; Sarah L Krein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Which Factors Promote Shared Understanding Between Physicians and Nurses in Inpatient Oncology Care Settings?: A Qualitative Exploration.

Authors:  Kaycee Crist; Megan Lafferty; Elizabeth Umberfield; Milisa Manojlovich
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 9.  The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Ashly D Black; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Chantelle Anandan; Kathrin Cresswell; Tomislav Bokun; Brian McKinstry; Rob Procter; Azeem Majeed; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Hiding in plain sight: communication theory in implementation science.

Authors:  Milisa Manojlovich; Janet E Squires; Barbara Davies; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.