BACKGROUND: Ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) has proven potent efficacy when used in heavily pretreated patients, harboring protease inhibitor-associated resistance mutations. Limited data are available on resistance pattern emerging in patients failing DRV/r and on subsequent remaining protease inhibitor options. METHODS: Analysis of baseline and failure resistance genotypes were performed in patients experiencing virologic failure (>200 copies/ml) after at least 3 months on a DRV/r (600/100 mg twice daily)-containing regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-five highly protease inhibitor-experienced patients were included. Baseline median human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA was 5 log10 copies/ml and number of total-protease inhibitor, major-protease inhibitor and DRV-associated-resistance mutations was 13, 4 and 3, respectively. Median viral replication duration on DRV/r selective pressure was 34 weeks. Emergence of DRV-associated-resistance mutations was observed in 72% (18/25) of patients, at codons L89I/M/V (32%), V32I (28%), V11I (20%), I47V/A (20%), I54L/M (20%), L33F/I (16%) and I50V (16%). A high risk of DRV resistance was observed in patients with 2 and 3 baseline DRV-associated-resistance mutations and in patients with more than 24 weeks of ongoing viral replication. According to 2007 ANRS algorithm, isolates classified as susceptible to ritonavir-boosted tipranavir decreased from baseline to failure from 76 to 60% and susceptible to DRV/r from 32 to 12%. CONCLUSION: Emerging mutations observed after DRV/r failure were those already described to impact the DRV efficacy. Our study provided recommendations to firstly, reconsider lowering the cutoff number of DRV mutations to two; secondly, avoid keeping patients on a DRV-failing regimen for more than 24 weeks and thirdly, to examine the efficacy of using tipranavir after DRV failure.
BACKGROUND:Ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) has proven potent efficacy when used in heavily pretreated patients, harboring protease inhibitor-associated resistance mutations. Limited data are available on resistance pattern emerging in patients failing DRV/r and on subsequent remaining protease inhibitor options. METHODS: Analysis of baseline and failure resistance genotypes were performed in patients experiencing virologic failure (>200 copies/ml) after at least 3 months on a DRV/r (600/100 mg twice daily)-containing regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-five highly protease inhibitor-experienced patients were included. Baseline median human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA was 5 log10 copies/ml and number of total-protease inhibitor, major-protease inhibitor and DRV-associated-resistance mutations was 13, 4 and 3, respectively. Median viral replication duration on DRV/r selective pressure was 34 weeks. Emergence of DRV-associated-resistance mutations was observed in 72% (18/25) of patients, at codons L89I/M/V (32%), V32I (28%), V11I (20%), I47V/A (20%), I54L/M (20%), L33F/I (16%) and I50V (16%). A high risk of DRV resistance was observed in patients with 2 and 3 baseline DRV-associated-resistance mutations and in patients with more than 24 weeks of ongoing viral replication. According to 2007 ANRS algorithm, isolates classified as susceptible to ritonavir-boosted tipranavir decreased from baseline to failure from 76 to 60% and susceptible to DRV/r from 32 to 12%. CONCLUSION: Emerging mutations observed after DRV/r failure were those already described to impact the DRV efficacy. Our study provided recommendations to firstly, reconsider lowering the cutoff number of DRV mutations to two; secondly, avoid keeping patients on a DRV-failing regimen for more than 24 weeks and thirdly, to examine the efficacy of using tipranavir after DRV failure.
Authors: Eva Poveda; Lourdes Anta; José Luis Blanco; José Luis Casado; Félix Gutiérrez; Federico García; Juan Luis Gómez-Sirvent; José Antonio Iribarren; Vincent Soriano; Carmen de Mendoza Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mina Henes; Klajdi Kosovrasti; Gordon J Lockbaum; Florian Leidner; Gily S Nachum; Ellen A Nalivaika; Daniel N A Bolon; Nese Kurt Yilmaz; Celia A Schiffer; Troy W Whitfield Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: G Sterrantino; M Zaccarelli; G Colao; F Baldanti; S Di Giambenedetto; T Carli; F Maggiolo; M Zazzi Journal: Infection Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: William J Allen; Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Scott R Brozell; Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz; Robert C Rizzo Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Nathan E Goldfarb; Meray Ohanessian; Shyamasri Biswas; T Dwight McGee; Brian P Mahon; David A Ostrov; Jose Garcia; Yan Tang; Robert McKenna; Adrian Roitberg; Ben M Dunn Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Andrea De Luca; Philippe Flandre; David Dunn; Maurizio Zazzi; Annemarie Wensing; Maria Mercedes Santoro; Huldrych F Günthard; Linda Wittkop; Theodoros Kordossis; Federico Garcia; Antonella Castagna; Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri; Duncan Churchill; Stéphane De Wit; Norbert H Brockmeyer; Arkaitz Imaz; Cristina Mussini; Niels Obel; Carlo Federico Perno; Bernardino Roca; Peter Reiss; Eugen Schülter; Carlo Torti; Ard van Sighem; Robert Zangerle; Diane Descamps Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 5.790