Literature DB >> 18690157

Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myocardial viability.

Raymond Y Kwong1, Hema Korlakunta.   

Abstract

Assessment of viability is pivotal to the prognosis of patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction. Patients with viable myocardium have a better prognosis with revascularization; however, patients with nonviable myocardium have worse outcomes with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality subsequent to revascularization. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging not only is the current reference standard technique in measuring cardiac chamber size and function and myocardial mass and volume but also provides spatially registered 2- or 3-dimensional data sets in myocardial perfusion and myocardial contrast enhancement in the same imaging session. Late gadolinium enhancement by CMR is the best current technique in discriminating myocardial scar versus viable myocardium. An extensive body of preclinical evidence has validated the detection and characterization of the morphology of infarcted tissue. In clinical studies, infarct characteristics by CMR has demonstrated a strong clinical utility in the prediction of left ventricular functional recovery and patient prognosis. In this paper, we aim to review the current CMR techniques in characterizing the spectrum of myocardial changes because of CAD, in the prediction of myocardial viability, and the current evidence of CMR's role in patient prognosis. In addition, we will also review the current literature comparing the clinical utility of CMR with other established imaging modalities in the assessment of CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690157     DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0B013e31817d550c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  13 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality imaging for assessment of myocardial viability: nuclear, echocardiography, MR, and CT.

Authors:  James A Arrighi; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Computed tomography diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a patient with normal initial cardiac biomarkers.

Authors:  Mai Vi H Hoang; Ken F Linnau; Edward A Gill; Bruce E Lehnert; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-10-01

3.  Remodeling of the ischemia-reperfused murine heart: 11.7-T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of contrast-enhanced infarct patches and transmurality.

Authors:  Surya C Gnyawali; Sashwati Roy; Molly McCoy; Sabyasachi Biswas; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 4.  SPECT and PET in ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  George Angelidis; Gregory Giamouzis; Georgios Karagiannis; Javed Butler; Ioannis Tsougos; Varvara Valotassiou; George Giannakoulas; Nikolaos Dimakopoulos; Andrew Xanthopoulos; John Skoularigis; Filippos Triposkiadis; Panagiotis Georgoulias
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Imaging approaches for the study of cell-based cardiac therapies.

Authors:  Joe F Lau; Stasia A Anderson; Eric Adler; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kim; Ju-Hee Lee; Eung Ju Kim; Dae-Gyun Park; Sung-Ji Park; Jin Joo Park; Mi-Seung Shin; Byung Su Yoo; Jong-Chan Youn; Sang Eun Lee; Sang Hyun Ihm; Se Yong Jang; Sang-Ho Jo; Jae Yeong Cho; Hyun-Jai Cho; Seonghoon Choi; Jin-Oh Choi; Seong Woo Han; Kyung Kuk Hwang; Eun Seok Jeon; Myeong-Chan Cho; Shung Chull Chae; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 7.  Diagnostic approaches for diabetic cardiomyopathy and myocardial fibrosis.

Authors:  Lisandro Maya; Francisco J Villarreal
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 8.  Diabetic cardiomyopathy: Pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation and management.

Authors:  Joseph M Pappachan; George I Varughese; Rajagopalan Sriraman; Ganesan Arunagirinathan
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2013-10-15

9.  What is the significance of unrecognized non-Q-wave myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Clara Kayei Chow
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging--Prognostic Implications.

Authors:  Anna M Nordenskjöld; Per Hammar; Håkan Ahlström; Tomas Bjerner; Olov Duvernoy; Kai M Eggers; Ole Fröbert; Nermin Hadziosmanovic; Bertil Lindahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.