Literature DB >> 18690058

Genetic and behavioral analysis of natural variation in Drosophila melanogaster pupation position.

Craig A L Riedl1, Marit Riedl, Trudy F C Mackay, Marla B Sokolowski.   

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster pupae are exposed to many biotic and abiotic dangers while immobilized during several days of metamorphosis. As a passive defense mechanism, appropriate pupation site selection represents an important mitigation of these threats. Pupation site selection is sensitive to genetic and environmental influences, but the specific mechanisms of the behavior are largely unknown. Using a set of 76 recombinant inbred strains we identify a single quantitative trait locus, at polytene position 56A01-C11, associated with pupation site variation. We furthermore present a detailed investigation into the wandering behaviors of two strains expressing different pupation position tendencies, and identify behavioral differences. Larvae from a strain that tends to pupate relatively far from the food also tend to travel significantly farther from the media during wandering. We did not observe consistent differences in either the number or duration of wandering forays made by near or far pupating strains. The ability of larvae to integrate several internal and external environmental cues while choosing a contextually appropriate pupation site, and specifically, the variation in this ability, presents a very interesting behavioral phenotype in this highly tractable genetic model organism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18690058     DOI: 10.4161/fly.3830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fly (Austin)        ISSN: 1933-6934            Impact factor:   2.160


  5 in total

1.  Natural variability in Drosophila larval and pupal NaCl tolerance.

Authors:  Craig A L Riedl; Sara Oster; Macarena Busto; Trudy F C Mackay; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.354

2.  The Loci of Behavioral Evolution: Evidence That Fas2 and tilB Underlie Differences in Pupation Site Choice Behavior between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Michael P Shahandeh; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Drosophila nociceptors mediate larval aversion to dry surface environments utilizing both the painless TRP channel and the DEG/ENaC subunit, PPK1.

Authors:  Wayne A Johnson; Justin W Carder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prepupal building behavior in Drosophila melanogaster and its evolution under resource and time constraints.

Authors:  Sunitha Narasimha; Sylvain Kolly; Marla B Sokolowski; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Roshan K Vijendravarma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Insights into DDT Resistance from the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.

Authors:  Joshua M Schmidt; Paul Battlay; Rebecca S Gledhill-Smith; Robert T Good; Chris Lumb; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Charles Robin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.