Literature DB >> 18690045

Differences between ion binding to eag and HERG voltage sensors contribute to differential regulation of activation and deactivation gating.

Meng Chin A Lin1, Diane M Papazian.   

Abstract

HERG (KCNH2) and ether-à-go-go (eag) (KCNH1) are members of the same subfamily of voltage-gated K+ channels. In eag, voltage-dependent activation is significantly slowed by extracellular divalent cations. To exert this effect, ions bind to a site located between transmembrane segments S2 and S3 in the voltage sensor domain where they interact with acidic residues that are conserved only among members of the eag subfamily. In HERG channels, extracellular divalent ions significantly accelerate deactivation. To investigate the ionbinding site in HERG, acidic residues in S2 and S3 were neutralized singly or in pairs to alanine, and the functional effects of extracellular Mg(2+) were characterized in Xenopus oocytes. To modulate deactivation kinetics in HERG, divalent cations interact with eag subfamily-specific acidic residues (D460 and D509) and also with an acidic residue in S2 (D456) that is widely conserved in the voltage-gated channel superfamily. In contrast, the analogous widely-conserved residue does not contribute to the ion-binding site that modulates activation kinetics in eag. We propose that structural differences between the ion-binding sites in the eag and HERG voltage sensors contribute to the differential regulation of activation and deactivation gating in these channels. A previously proposed model for S4 conformational changes during voltagedependent activation can account for the differential regulation of gating seen in eag and HERG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690045      PMCID: PMC2847495          DOI: 10.4161/chan.1.6.5760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Channels (Austin)        ISSN: 1933-6950            Impact factor:   2.581


  52 in total

1.  Differential effects of amino-terminal distal and proximal domains in the regulation of human erg K(+) channel gating.

Authors:  C G Viloria; F Barros; T Giráldez; D Gómez-Varela; P de la Peña
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Robert Dumaine; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  A novel extracellular calcium sensing mechanism in voltage-gated potassium ion channels.

Authors:  J P Johnson; J R Balser; P B Bennett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Conformational switch between slow and fast gating modes: allosteric regulation of voltage sensor mobility in the EAG K+ channel.

Authors:  Roland Schönherr; Lidia M Mannuzzu; Ehud Y Isacoff; Stefan H Heinemann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  A common polymorphism associated with antibiotic-induced cardiac arrhythmia.

Authors:  F Sesti; G W Abbott; J Wei; K T Murray; S Saksena; P J Schwartz; S G Priori; D M Roden; A L George; S A Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Altered gating of HERG potassium channels by cobalt and lanthanum.

Authors:  J A Sanchez-Chapula; M C Sanguinetti
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 7.  I(Kr): the hERG channel.

Authors:  G N Tseng
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Extracellular Mg2+ regulates activation of rat eag potassium channel.

Authors:  H Terlau; J Ludwig; R Steffan; O Pongs; W Stühmer; S H Heinemann
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Extracellular Mg(2+) modulates slow gating transitions and the opening of Drosophila ether-à-Go-Go potassium channels.

Authors:  C Y Tang; F Bezanilla; D M Papazian
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Mg(2+) modulates voltage-dependent activation in ether-à-go-go potassium channels by binding between transmembrane segments S2 and S3.

Authors:  W R Silverman; C Y Tang; A F Mock; K B Huh; D M Papazian
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intracellular linkers are involved in Mg2+-dependent modulation of the Eag potassium channel.

Authors:  Xinqiu Liu; Yuying Wu; Yi Zhou
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Transfer of ion binding site from ether-a-go-go to Shaker: Mg2+ binds to resting state to modulate channel opening.

Authors:  Meng-chin A Lin; Jeff Abramson; Diane M Papazian
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  External protons destabilize the activated voltage sensor in hERG channels.

Authors:  Yu Patrick Shi; Yen May Cheng; Aaron C Van Slyke; Tom W Claydon
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Tuning of EAG K(+) channel inactivation: molecular determinants of amplification by mutations and a small molecule.

Authors:  Vivek Garg; Frank B Sachse; Michael C Sanguinetti
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Modification of hERG1 channel gating by Cd2+.

Authors:  Jennifer Abbruzzese; Frank B Sachse; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Michael C Sanguinetti
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Extracellular protons accelerate hERG channel deactivation by destabilizing voltage sensor relaxation.

Authors:  Yu Patrick Shi; Samrat Thouta; Yen May Cheng; Tom W Claydon
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Dynamics of the EAG1 K+ channel selectivity filter assessed by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Harald Bernsteiner; Michael Bründl; Anna Stary-Weinzinger
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Voltage-dependent gating of HERG potassium channels.

Authors:  Yen May Cheng; Tom W Claydon
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  S0, where is it?

Authors:  Diane M Papazian
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 4.086

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.