Literature DB >> 18689900

Experimental estimation of mutation rates in a wheat population with a gene genealogy approach.

Anne-Laure Raquin1, Frantz Depaulis, Amaury Lambert, Nathalie Galic, Philippe Brabant, Isabelle Goldringer.   

Abstract

Microsatellite markers are extensively used to evaluate genetic diversity in natural or experimental evolving populations. Their high degree of polymorphism reflects their high mutation rates. Estimates of the mutation rates are therefore necessary when characterizing diversity in populations. As a complement to the classical experimental designs, we propose to use experimental populations, where the initial state is entirely known and some intermediate states have been thoroughly surveyed, thus providing a short timescale estimation together with a large number of cumulated meioses. In this article, we derived four original gene genealogy-based methods to assess mutation rates with limited bias due to relevant model assumptions incorporating the initial state, the number of new alleles, and the genetic effective population size. We studied the evolution of genetic diversity at 21 microsatellite markers, after 15 generations in an experimental wheat population. Compared to the parents, 23 new alleles were found in generation 15 at 9 of the 21 loci studied. We provide evidence that they arose by mutation. Corresponding estimates of the mutation rates ranged from 0 to 4.97 x 10(-3) per generation (i.e., year). Sequences of several alleles revealed that length polymorphism was only due to variation in the core of the microsatellite. Among different microsatellite characteristics, both the motif repeat number and an independent estimation of the Nei diversity were correlated with the novel diversity. Despite a reduced genetic effective size, global diversity at microsatellite markers increased in this population, suggesting that microsatellite diversity should be used with caution as an indicator in biodiversity conservation issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18689900      PMCID: PMC2516091          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.071332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  55 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  An unusually low microsatellite mutation rate in Dictyostelium discoideum, an organism with unusually abundant microsatellites.

Authors:  Ryan McConnell; Sara Middlemist; Clea Scala; Joan E Strassmann; David C Queller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genetic control of microsatellite stability.

Authors:  E A Sia; S Jinks-Robertson; T D Petes
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1997-01-31       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Mutation of human short tandem repeats.

Authors:  J L Weber; C Wong
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Estimating Y chromosome specific microsatellite mutation frequencies using deep rooting pedigrees.

Authors:  E Heyer; J Puymirat; P Dieltjes; E Bakker; P de Knijff
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Mutation and evolution of microsatellites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Schug; C M Hutter; M A Noor; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations.

Authors:  S Kruglyak; R T Durrett; M D Schug; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Microsatellite analysis reveals a progressive widening of the genetic basis in the elite durum wheat germplasm.

Authors:  M Maccaferri; M C Sanguineti; P Donini; R Tuberosa
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Geoff K Nicholls; Allen G Rodrigo; Wiremu Solomon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness of in situ and ex situ conservation of crop diversity. What a Phaseolus vulgaris L. landrace case study can tell us.

Authors:  Valeria Negri; Barbara Tiranti
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Mutational dynamics of microsatellites.

Authors:  Atul Bhargava; F F Fuentes
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Chromosomal structural changes and microsatellite variations in newly synthesized hexaploid wheat mediated by unreduced gametes.

Authors:  Hao Li; Yajuan Wang; Xiaoxue Guo; Yinpeng Du; Changyou Wang; Wanquan Ji
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Efficiently tracking selection in a multiparental population: the case of earliness in wheat.

Authors:  Stéphanie Thépot; Gwendal Restoux; Isabelle Goldringer; Frédéric Hospital; David Gouache; Ian Mackay; Jérôme Enjalbert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Using classical population genetics tools with heterochroneous data: time matters!

Authors:  Frantz Depaulis; Ludovic Orlando; Catherine Hänni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Microsatellite mutation rate during allohexaploidization of newly resynthesized wheat.

Authors:  Jiangtao Luo; Ming Hao; Li Zhang; Jixiang Chen; Lianquan Zhang; Zhongwei Yuan; Zehong Yan; Youliang Zheng; Huaigang Zhang; Yang Yen; Dengcai Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.